I think it was a type of government
The most likely reason mexican citizens had conflicting views of porfirio Diaz’s rule is because He limited citizens' freedoms but he increased foreign investments and improved infrastructure. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is Diaz’s rule?</h3>
Generally, During the president of Porfirio Daz (1876–80; 1884–1911), Mexico witnessed considerable development but political rights were constrained and the free press was muzzled. This era is known as the Porfiriato.
In conclusion, The fact that Porfirio Diaz restricted citizens' freedoms while boosting foreign investment and improving infrastructure is the most likely source of the mixed opinions that Mexicans held of his leadership.
Read more about Diaz’s rule
brainly.com/question/774392
#SPJ1
Answer:
Natural rights and popular sovereignty
Explanation:
In relation to democracy, natural rights are each individual person's right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (if based on Thomas Jefferson's ideals, life liberty and property if based on John Locke's ideals) which are pretty important as they give each person their indivudual freedoms. Poplar sovereugnty basically means that elected representatives get their power from the consent of the people, which most modern day democracys rely on to stay functioning effectively.
Basically the 10 amendments so
1st freedom of speech
2nd right to bear arms (own guns)
3rd Nobody can force citizens to house soldiers
4th A police needs warrants to search you
5th the right to have our rights read to us when arrested
6th right to a fair trial
7th right to a jury in civil cases
8th No cruel bails, fines or punishments for example, Nobody can go to jail for 20 years for stealing a candy bar
9th Any basic and obvious rights not mentioned in the constitution
10th Powers not given to federal government is given to state government
1. capital, 8.5
2. 25 thousand
3. True
4. hundreds, 64, 24, sound