Stream-of-consciousness is a very stylistic form of free indirect discourse. It is not spontaneous, or unintentional, or anything of the sort. In fact, if anything, it's just the opposite. It's highly stylized, but also purposeful and calculating. It sees the world wholly through the character's mind instead of through their senses, save for how the mind and the senses interact.
It relates to a lot of things - free association, synesthesia, free indirect discourse, without actually being any of them.
<span>There's only a handful of writers that can actually do stream-of-consciousness writing with any success - Joyce and Faulkner come to mind immediately. In short, there's nothing wrong with trying it, but there's also nothing wrong with not having done that, but having done, say, free association instead.</span>
Answer:
hello. my self lol. ,.................?
Best Answer:<span> </span><span>Yes there is a strong relationship between Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics and what you call the "moral theory" of St. Thomas (Aquinas). They both agree that happiness is the ultimate good, or desired "end" (goal; end cause; a.k.a. "telos") of human beings. But as a moral dogmatic theologian, Aquinas goes beyond what Aristotle called "intellectual and moral virtue", as the most desireable "end" or goal for human beings, which makes humans most happy, to "speculating" on God's goodness, beauty and other attributes in eternity as the ultimate good (producing human happiness) for humans in a "beatific"/happy afterlife --- commonly known as seeing God in heaven.
</span>
Answer:
B. Michelle tried out for the track team every year; she didn’t make the squad as a junior she did get chosen her senior year.
Explanation:
Missing period after "junior"
