My personal opinion to what the answers are:
Readers are uneasy with the narrator's growing instability,
Readers question the narrator's ability to act rationally,
Readers understand that the account given by the narrator is true.
I hope this helped, again, this is only my opinion to what I believe the answers are.
Let us dissect each sentence to tell which of these does not follow the rules for subject-verb agreement.
A.) The subject is 'each of the students' while the verb is 'is'. More particularly, the verb refers to 'each' which is singular. So, this is correct.
B.) The subject is 'student' while the verb is 'were'. The word 'were' is the paste tense of are which is used for a plural subject. But since student is singular, then the verb should have been 'was'. So, this is incorrect.
C.) The subject is 'my dog and my cat' which pertains to two nouns, thus it is plural. It agrees with its plural verb 'are'.
D.) The subject is 'Tom' while the verb is 'does'. Both are intended for singular use. So, this is correct.
Therefore, the answer to this is letter B.
Answer:
B...? It could be A but my bet is on B.
Explanation:
She is supporting an inference from the text. An inference is something that is implied, and the person saying they've "witnessed much fighting" infers that they're old, whereas "I am wounded with iron" can be taken to mean he's been wounded by a weapon like a sword.
The most obvious answer would have to be C. organic farming techniques.
The other answers have completely nothing to do with the passage.
