Answer:
$5,160
Explanation:
Predetermined Overhead Rate on Capacity = Total Estimated Manufacturing Overhead / Estimated Capacity for the Year
Predetermined Overhead Rate on Capacity = $34,840 / 29,000 MH
Predetermined Overhead Rate on Capacity = $1.20 MH
Actual use of capacity = 24,700 hours
Unused hours = 29,000 hours - 24,700 hours
Unused hours = 4,300 hour
Cost of unused capacity = 4,300 hours * $1.20 MH
Cost of unused capacity = $5,160
Answer:
Leveraging the experience of one group to help another group.
Explanation:
Southwestern Construction is hoping to use (leverage) the knowledge of the team in one office by sharing the knowledge with another office and hoping that the second office will also become more efficient simply by adopting the new strategies.
Answer:
The proper IFRS presentation is:
d. Listing current assets before noncurrent assets, and listing Current Liabilities before Retained Earnings
Explanation:
The above listing is in the order of liquidity, especially of current assets and noncurrent assets. This listing shows all the current assets before the noncurrent assets with Cash, Accounts Receivable, etc following that order for the listing of current assets. And the more permanent assets are listed last. Similarly, for the Liabilities and Equity side, the Current Liabilities are listed first before the Noncurrent Liabilities followed by Equity (Share Capital and Retained Earnings) in that order.
Answer:
- The modified internal rate of return for PROJECT A:
b. 24.18%
- The internal rate of return for Project B :
b. 35.27%.
Explanation:
The mean difference between the MIRR and the IRR it's that the IRR assumes that the obtained positive cash flows are reinvested at the same rate at which they were generated, while the MIRR considers that these cashflow will be reinvested at the external rate of return, this case 10%.
Project A Y1 Y2
-$95,000 $65,000 $75,000
24,18% MIRR
Project B -$120,000
Y 1 $64,000
Y 2 $67,000
Y 3 $56,000
Y 4 $45,000
TIR 35,27%
Answer:
The argument that the higher courts had decided the cases of similar facts and circumstance in such a way that he can expect that the court rules in his company's favor is a valid argument. The argument is based on the doctrine of stare decisions. The meaning of the doctrine stare decisions is to stand on decided cases. It is a common practice to decide the case based on the former decisions of the judicial systems. It is a set principle that if the court of higher rank has set a precedent then lower court must adhere to it. Therefore, this argument is a valid argument.
The courts are bound to follow the rule set by its higher authority. However, it is not always necessary to obligate its precedents and sometimes, the court can depart from this rule. This could be done only in the circumstances where it is found that the precedent is simply incorrect or due to social changes or technological changes made the precedent inapplicable. Therefore, the court in this case can not necessarily be ruled as the other courts had done.
