Answer:
Interest= $1750000
Explanation:
We know that:
EBIT
interest (-)
=earnings before taxes
tax (-)
=Net profit
EBIT= 6750000
Interest= ?
t= 0,40
Net profit= 3000000
interest= [netprofit/(1-t)]- EBIT
interest= (3000000/0,60)-6750000
interest= 1750000
Tax=(EBIT-interest)*0,35= 2000000
Answer:
The correct answer is E
Explanation:
ROE termed as or stand as Return on Equity, which is described as the profitability ratio that evaluates the firm ability for generating the profits from its shareholders investment in the company or firm.
The formula to represent ROE is value of Net Income attributable to the equity shareholders.
ROE = Net Income agter Taxes / Shareholders Equity
And there is one more formula which is a disaggregation of ROE into the non- operating as well as operating components, which is as:
ROE = [ROE +(FLEV × Spread)] x NCI
Therefore, option A and C are correct.
Answer:
$315,198
Explanation:
WACC = [ Equity / Total value ] * cost of equity + [ Debt / Total value ] * Cost of debt.
WACC = 11.5%
Exit multiple = Total cash outflow / Total cash inflow
Exit multiple = $120,000 / 36,000 = 3.3x
EBITDA of the company is $178,412.
Answer:
The answer is: D) Not human subjects
Explanation:
Her research project is about junk food availability, and that doesn´t include research with human beings. The research should be classified as Not Human Subject since it doesn´t involve any living individual.
Research done on humans are classified as:
- Exempt from review: if it involves very minimal or no risk for human participants.
- Expedited review: if it doesn´t classify as exempt review but it involves no more than minimal risk to the participants and meets other standards, such as not including protected classes or vulnerable populations, and not using intentional deception.
- Full board review: If it doesn´t classify as exempt from review or expedited review.
Claims that drop-out rate has increased because more women have taken jobs in the workplace is an example of false cause fallacy.
A false cause fallacy is said to occur in a statement because the link between the premises and conclusion does not even exist.
Here, phrase one is "high school drop-out rate has increased" and phrase two is <em>"because </em><em>more women </em><em>have </em><em>taken jobs </em><em>in the workplace"</em>
<em />
If we assess the two phrase, we will observe that their is no link between the statement to facilitate a valid conclusion because when woman taking jobs in workplaces can not result to increase in drop rate in high school.
Therefore, it is an example of false cause fallacy.
Read more about this here
<em>brainly.com/question/6987057</em>
