The correct answer is "a state trial court". Since the dispute is over a contract between two people in the same city, it is very likely that the case will be considered as local and as part of a state court jurisdiction. State courts handle the majority of the civil cases in the US, and since it is not mentioned that the case has been handle in another court, it is more likely thay a state trial court would handle this dispute.
I think it's the tax commissioner but i'm not sure.
<span>carved out several east-to-west trails that helped settlers move west</span>
Answer:
*set up rules by adding africa to eurooe
*reduc3d tensions between countries so there wouldn't be any wars
The answer really depends on whether the farmer is also the landlord or only a worker in the fields, and bearing in mind that the question refers only to Chavez’ reforms, not what is now called Chavismo, that is to say, the rule of President Maduro.
If the first, then there are chances that the landlord would feel threatened about the fact this his land could be —although not necessarily— appropriated by the State, but also, he might feel relieved to learn that his land could be more productive since there would be a lot more subsidies for farming since the oil revenues of the country would again be in the hands of the State.
If it is the second possibility, the farmer most likely would feel relieved altogether since subsidies to labor power and farming would mean greater income and better living conditions for him and his family.
