Answer:
The correct answer is a. Humphreys used license plate numbers to target their homes and interview the men without disclosing the real subject of his study.
Explanation:
Laud Humphreys (1930-1988) was a sociologist who for his PhD dissertation wrote a study called <em>Tearoom Trade</em> (1968), where he studied the behavior of males who engaged in homosexual sex in public toilets. Humphreys made a series of discoveries, like finding out that most of the men who engaged in these practices were not openly or overtly homosexual, and even a majority of them (54%) were married. However, his research was widely criticized because of how he performed it. Humphreys acted out as a sort of look-out for the men in the toilets, but without disclosing his identity as a researcher. Moreover, <u>Humphreys followed the unwitting subjects of his study to their homes by </u><u>tracking their license plate numbers and interviewed them</u><u>, posing as a government health officer and hiding his true identity as a sociologist conducting research</u>. Lying to subjects and hiding from them that they're part of a study is frowned upon by the scientific community, so the research was widely controversial, and it's still brought up as an example of the ethics of social research.
His panic disorder was apparently accompanied by "agoraphobia".
Agoraphobia refers to a kind of nervousness issue in which you fear and keep away from spots or circumstances that may make you frenzy and influence you to feel caught, powerless or humiliated. Individuals with agoraphobia frequently have indications of a fit of anxiety, for example, a quick pulse and queasiness, when they end up in an upsetting circumstance.
<span>The correction answer when dealing with the development of self lies within both interactions with other and our own internal thoughts. There is no absolute proof that either is more proven than the next. So the only logical conclusion is that we are influenced by others as we grow but when we hit adulthood we consider those influences and ultimately we make our own decisions on who we will become as a person.</span>
Answer:
True, as a result of the view that, the lobbying carried out by the former legislators, former legislative aids along with former governors might create an avenue whereby corruption can crop up which would affect the credibility of the election.
For example, a former governor might lobby the state executive agency like those in charge of investigating corruption. This would prevent corruption charges to be brought against the state governor from being investigated adequately.
Explanation:
The answer is false.
Because every culture has a different society and role, and you cannot change that.
For example, like ancient egypt.
Hope helps!-Aparri
