1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Helga [31]
3 years ago
14

A parcel of vacant land 80 feet wide and 200 feet deep was sold for $2000 per front foot. how much money would a broker receive

for her 60% share in the 10% commission?
Business
1 answer:
Vlad1618 [11]3 years ago
6 0

First, calculate the area of the vacant land by multiplying the given dimensions.

<span>                                    Area = (80 ft)(200 ft) </span>

<span>                                                Area = 16000 ft^2</span>

 

Then, multiply the calculated area with the given price per ft^2.

<span>                                    Total price = ($2000/ft^2)(16,000 ft^2)</span>

<span>                                    Total price = $32,000,000</span>

 

The 10% commission of selling the land is equal to $3,200,000.

The money that the broker will receive will be 60% of the commission.

<span>                                    = (0.6)($3,200,000)</span>

<span>                                    = <span>$1,920,000</span></span>

You might be interested in
Name two arguments that support international trade.
konstantin123 [22]
One argument for is that exports help improve the terms of trade of a country and also opens markets for domestic producers, meaning they can grow, employ more workers, earn more income, etc. Another argument for is that it increases competition, as there are goods coming in from all corners of the world, which may pressure domestic pressures to be more competitive and innovative with their products, improving its quality and product choice.

An argument for protectionism could be that imports may actually be harming domestic producers, which as we can see from President Trump's rhetoric, we can deduce that cheap imports from China will take sales revenue away from American producers and potentially cause them to lose customers and close down. Another argument for is that quotas and tariffs will make imports more expensive, which may make domestic products more price competitive.

Regarding the opinions, come up with it yourself. Think of the pros and cons and make a balanced judgement.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
a newspaper, prints Clark’s picture of Lana in his newspaper as a lead to an article concerning the negligence of children. The
den301095 [7]

COMPLETE PROBLEM

Lana, a ten-year-old child, is run over by a car negligently driven by Mitchell. Lana, at the time of the accident, was acting reasonably and without negligence. Clark, a newspaper reporter, photographs Lana while she is lying in the street in great pain. Two years later, Perry, the publisher of a newspaper, prints Clark's picture of Lana in his newspaper as a lead to an article concerning the negligence of children. The caption under the picture reads: "They ask to be killed." Lana, who has recovered from the accident, brings suit against Clark and Perry. What result? Explain.

Explanation:

Judgement for Lana against Perry but not against Clark. The facts make out a case against Perry for the tort of invasion of privacy in particular placing another in a false light (INVASION OF PRIVACY:FALSE LIGHT). Section 652E of the restatement imposes liability for publicity which places another in a false light. It is unlikely that Perry could utilize the first amendment as a defense because Lana was neither a public official nor a public figure. Even if that defense were available, it is forfeited if Perry acted with "malice", which appears to be the case here because Perry acted in reckless disregard of the truth. Clark did not commit the tort of intrusion because he photographed an event that occurred in public.

3 0
3 years ago
Erie Company manufactures a mobile fitness device called the Jogging Mate. The company uses standards to control its costs. The
Tom [10]

a. Standard labor-hours is 7920 hours.

b. Standard labor cost allowed is $42,768.

c. The labor spending variance is $1588(U).

d.  The labor rate variance is $1706 and the labor efficiency variance $3294(U).

e.  The variable overhead rate is $5971(U) and efficiency variances for the month $5580(U).

<u>Explanation:</u>

a)Standars hours(SH) allowed to make 19800 jogging mates

=SH per unit \times 19800

=(24/60)*19800

=7920 hours

24/60 has been taken to convert minutes into hours.  

b)Standard Labor Cost (SC) of 19800 jogging mates

=19800 \times SC per unit=19800 \times $2.16\\=$42,768

=$42,768

c)Labour Spending Variance

=Standard Cost - Actual Cost(AC)=$42,768 - $44,356=$1588(U)

=$1588(U)

d)Labor Rate Variance  

=(SR per hour-AR per hour)\timesAH=(5.4-5.2)*8530=$1706(F)

=$1706

Actual Hours(AH) * Actual Rate per hour(AR)= Actual Cost(AC)

8530 \times AR = $44,356

AR = \frac{44356}{8530}\\ \\AR = 5.2

Labor Efficiency Variance

=(SH-AH) \times SR\\=(7920-8530)*$5.4=$3294(U)

=$3294(U)

e) Variable overhead rate variance = Actual hours worked  (Standard overhead rate - Actual overhead rate)

= 8530  (4.5 - 5.20)

= $5971(U)

Actual overhead rate = $44,356 / 8530 = 5.20

Variable overhead efficiency variance = Standard overhead rate   (Standard hours - Actual hours)

= 4.50  (7290 - 8530)

= $5580(U).

8 0
2 years ago
If a 25 percent decrease in the price of sapphires causes a 15 percent decrease in the quantity of diamonds demanded, then the c
natta225 [31]
To solve for the cross-price elasticity of demand:
Take the quantity of the diamonds demanded and divide it by the decrease in the price of sapphires. 
Cross-price elasticity of demand = 15/25
Cross-price elasticity of demand = 0.6

When you are solving for the cross-price elasticity of demand, you are seeing the response to the demand of a item when price changes for another good. 
4 0
3 years ago
In a monopoly market, Select one: a. other firms have no incentive to enter the market. b. profits will always be positive becau
Ratling [72]

Answer: Option (c) is correct.

Explanation:

Correct option: The demand facing the firm is downward-sloping because it is the market demand.

In a monopoly market conditions, there is a single seller in the market and the monopolist firm is price setter. But the demand curve faced by the monopoly firm is downward sloping because monopolist is a single firm who is operating in the market and there is a need to reduce prices if he wants to sell an additional units.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The trend in the poverty rate since the mid 1960's___________.
    9·1 answer
  • When Congress established the Federal Reserve in​ 1913, its main responsibility was
    5·1 answer
  • Cheyenne is the manager of a local small hotel. just today cheyenne received word that a major convention will be coming to town
    13·1 answer
  • At the beginning of 2018, England Dresses has an inventory of $75,000. However, management wants to reduce the amount of invento
    15·2 answers
  • Consider a two-period model of a small open economy with a single good each period. Let preferences of the representative househ
    11·1 answer
  • Which of these assumptions is often realistic for a firm in the short run? a. The firm can vary both the size of its factory and
    10·1 answer
  • In the 1850s the French franc was valued by both gold and silver, under the official French ratio which equated a gold franc to
    14·1 answer
  • A firm presents a market value balance sheet and a book value balance sheet to prospective investors. What is wrong with using t
    5·1 answer
  • Upon beginning her career at Davidson Inc., a small consulting firm, Stephanie Benjamin receives a copy of the firm's organizati
    5·1 answer
  • When won’t the CGA apply?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!