Answer:
Congress passed the War Powers Resolution in the aftermath of the Vietnam War to address these concerns and provide a set of procedures for both the President and Congress to follow in situations where the introduction of U.S. forces abroad could lead to their involvement in armed conflict.
Ever since its passage in 1973, politicians have been divided on the War Powers Act’s effectiveness. Supporters of the resolution maintain that it is a much-needed check on the president’s ability to make war without Congressional approval.
Critics, meanwhile, argue the law has failed to create better coordination between the executive and legislative branches. Some believe the law is too restrictive on the president’s ability to respond to foreign emergencies, while others contend that it gives the president free reign to commit troops overseas.
Most experts tend to agree that the War Powers Act has rarely worked as intended. According to one study by the Congressional Research Service, presidents have traditionally avoided citing certain provisions of the resolution whenever they submit reports to Congress. As a result, the 60-day time limits of the law have rarely been triggered, and it has never been used to bring an end to a foreign military operation.
Because of the War Powers Act’s contentious history, there have occasionally been calls for the resolution to be repealed or amended. One notable attempt came in 1995, when the U.S. House of Representatives voted on an amendment that would have repealed many of the Act’s main components. The measure was narrowly defeated by a vote of 217-204.
that would have to be Mobutu sese Seko
The Constitution is highly honored today, at home and around the world. However,<span> w</span>hen it was originally written many Americans were against it. They were upset that th<span>e </span>document contained<span> no Bill of Rights to protect their individual f</span>reed<span>oms. </span>Ma<span>ny </span>felt that the Constitution<span> w</span>as<span> t</span>he work of rich men who meant to weaken what the American<span> R</span>evolution<span> h</span>ad<span> achieved.</span>
This is correct. Toxic loans and mortgages are at fault for the crisis during the 2000s. The banks gave mortgages and loans way higher than the assets were worth, so when people couldn't pay banks couldn't get the money back.