Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The Length of <em>JK</em> is 10
Step-by-step explanation:
Because <<em>J </em>is congruent to <<em>L</em> we know that the triangle in question must be isosceles as in an isosceles triangle two angles opposite of each other are equal. (This is also true for equilateral triangles, however, in an equilateral triangle all sides must be congruent, so we can rule equilateral out as <em>LJ </em>is not congruent to <em>KL.) </em>This means that the triangle must be isosceles.
In an isosceles triangle the side opposite each other are congruent, and the angles opposite each other are congruent when split down the line of symmetry.
Therefor, the length of <em>JK </em>must be congruent to the length of <em>KL. </em>In other words if <em>JK </em>= 10, then <em>KL </em>must equal 10 as well.
Answer:
-8 ≤ y ≤ 8
Step-by-step explanation:
Subtract 7 from the first one:
y ≥ -8
Subtract 3 from the second one, then multiply by 4.
y/4 ≤ 2
y ≤ 8
Now, you can write these as a compound inequality:
-8 ≤ y ≤ 8
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
You basically solve these the same way you would an equation. The only difference is that multiplying or dividing by a negative number will reverse the inequality symbol:
2 > 1
-2 < -1 . . . . . multiplied above by -1.
We could do it with algebra. But we can also do it the long way, which is
shorter than the algebraic way.
The digit in the tens place is 3 times the digit in the units place.
So the number MUST be
31, or
62, or
93 .
It can't be anything else.
Now here they are again, with the reverse of each one:
31 . . . 13 The new number is 18 less.
62 . . . 26 The new number is 36 less.
93 . . . 39 The new number is 54 less.
Obviously, the original number is 62.
