All categories

3 years ago

Following are financial data from year-end financial statements of Portland Company for 2017, 2016 and 2015.

Business

1 answer:

denpristay [2]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Answers are calculated below

Explanation:

Financial ratios can be calculated according to their formulas. Both formulas and calculation are as follows

CURRENT RATIO

Current ratio = Current assets/current liabilities

Current ratio (2016) = $360,000/$250,000

Current ratio (2016) = 1.44

Current ratio (2017) = $450,000 / $300,000

Current ratio (2017) = 1.50

ACID RATIO

Acid ratio = (Current asset - inventory)/current liabilities

Acid ratio (2016) = (360,000 - 165,000)/250,000

Acid ratio (2016) = 0.78

Acid ratio (2017) = (450,000-225,000)/300,000

Acid ratio (2017) = 225,000/300,000

Acid ratio (2017) = 0.75

INVENTORY TURNOVER RATIO

Inventory turnover ratio = cost of good Sold / Average inventory

Inventory turnover ratio (2016) = 864,000/(360,000 ÷2)

Inventory turnover ratio (2016) = 864,000/180,000

Inventory turnover ratio (2016) = 4.80

Inventory turnover ratio (2017) = 1,023,750 / ( 390,000 ÷ 2)

Inventory turnover ratio (2017) = 1,023,750 / 195,000

Inventory turnover ratio (2017) = 5.25

DAYS SALE IN RECEIVABLE

Days sale in receivable = 365/Average receivable turnover ratio

Days sale in receivable (2016) = 365/ 12.67(w1)

Days sale in receivable (2016) = 28.81 days

Days sale in receivable (2017) =365/11.7(w1)

Days sale in receivable (2017) = 31.20 days

Working 1

Account receivable turnover ratio = Sales/ Average receivable

Account receivable turnover ratio (2016) = 1,752,000/138,288(w2)

Account receivable turnover ratio = 12.67 times

Account receivable turnover ratio (2017) = 1,642,500/140,351(w2)

Account receivable turnover ratio (2017) = 11.7 times

Working 2

Average receivable = (Opening + Closing) /2

Average receivable (2016) = (132,000 + 144,576) /2

Average receivable (2016) = 138,288

Average receivable (2017) = (144,576 +136,125 ) /2

Average receivable (2017) = 140,351

You might be interested in

Jacques has plans to go to a play and already has a $50 nonrefundable, nonexchangeable, and nontransferable ticket. Now Kyoko, w

77julia77 [94]

Answer:

Explanation:

Rightly ignored a sunk cost since he cannot recover the money back and it really does not have any effect on the decision in the future

3 0

3 years ago

Allocative efficiency occurs:

jonny [76]

Answer:

a. Anywhere inside or on the production possibilities frontier.

Explanation:

In an economy, the allocative efficiency may be defined as the economic state where the production of various goods or services is aligned with the preferences with the consumers.

The allocative efficiency always materializes at the intersection of the supply curves and the demand curves.

On the $\text{equilibrium point,}$ the price for a supply $\text{exactly matches}$ with the demand for the product $\text{for that supply}$ at that price, and thus all the products are sold.

It occurs anywhere on the production possibilities frontier or on the inside of the frontier.

Therefore, the correct option is (a).

5 0

3 years ago

Tech Solutions is a consulting firm that uses a job-order costing system. Its direct materials consist of hardware and software

Whitepunk [10]

Answer:

Tech Solutions

1. The predetermined overhead rate is:

= $6

2. The total job cost for the Xavier Company engagement is:

= $79,470

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Estimated direct labor-hours for the year = 55,000

Estimated fixed overhead cost = $302,500

Estimated variable overhead cost ($0.50 per DLH) = $27,500

Total overhead costs = $330,000 ($27,500 + $302,500)

Actual overhead cost for the year = $321,300

Actual total direct labor-hours = 58,850

Predetermined overhead rate = $6 ($330,000/55,000)

Xavier Company's Job:

Direct materials $ 50,850

Direct labor cost $ 27,300

Direct labor hours worked 220

Applied overhead = $1,320 ($6 * 220)

Total job cost = $79,470

6 0

2 years ago

Production Volume4,000 Units5,000 UnitsDirect Materials$85.80 per unit$85.80 per unitDirect Labor$56.10 per unit$56.10 per unitM

guapka [62]

Answer:

4300 units would cost $ 898461 or $ 208.9 ≅ $ 209 per unit

Explanation:

Production Volume 4,000 Units 5,000 Units

Direct Materials $85.80 per unit $85.80 per unit

Direct Labor $56.10 per unit $56.10 per unit

Manufacturing overhead $73.60 per unit $62.10 per unit

Total Manufacturing Costs $ 215.5 per unit $ 203.7 per unit

The best estimate of the total cost to manufacture 4,300

4000 units at $ 215.5 = $ 862,000

5000 units at $ 203.7= $1018500

9000 units would Cost = $ 862,000+$1018500= $ 1880500

We have taken the total of the two costs and then divided with the number of 9000 units to get an average price as the fixed costs are decreasing as the number of units increase from 4000 to 5000.

4300 units would cost = $ 1880500/ 9000 * 4300= $ 898461 or $ 208.9 ≅

$ 209 per unit

5 0

3 years ago

Jacko Inc. hired you as a consultant to help estimate its cost of capital. You have been provided with the following data: D0 =

Valentin [98]

Answer:

Jacko Inc Costo fo Capitak8.15%

Explanation:

From the gordon model for stock valuation

$\frac{divends}{return-growth} = Intrinsic \: Value$