Hello!
The decision in Miranda v. Arizona influenced the creation of the "Miranda Rights." This basically means that when a person is arrested, his/her rights must be read to him so that he understands them. Otherwise, the arrestee could accidentally self-incriminate or cause other similar problems for himself.
The Miranda rights include:
1. The right to remain silent
2. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law
3. The right to an attorney
4. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed to you
I hope this helps you! have a great day!
-Mal
Answer:
genes may have a stronger effect than familial environment on some talent.
Explanation:
In Reproductions, there is a transfers chemically coded hereditary information contained in DNA deoxyribonucleic acid is transferred from parents to offspring. Heredity is commonly defined as passing traits from parent to offspring.
Genetics
This is the study of how traits are being passed down or inherited from parent to offspring via DNA, simply called genes
Genes
This are found in certain positions on specific chromosomes. They carry the trait that is expressed (e.g. short, tall, straight hair,math skills etc.) Skills e.g maths skills can be an inheritance from the birth parents.
Answer:
not paying atetion to who u speaking to
Explanation:
The answer is rarely. Motions to suppress physical evidence are trailed in fewer than 5% of the cases, largely drug and weapons cases though serious motions to suppress identifications and confessions are filed in 2% and 4% of the cases. The success rate of motions to suppress is equally marginal. Successful motions to suppress physical evidence occur in only 0.69% of the cases, while successful motions to suppress identifications or confessions occur much less often. Furthermore, not all who successfully suppressed evidence runaway conviction in which particularly when only an identification or a confession was suppressed. In all, only 46 cases less than 0.6% of the cases studies were nowhere to be found because of the three exclusionary rules combined most of them linking offenses that would have suffered less than six months of imprisonment or first offenders. Finally, the influence of unsuccessful motions on succeeding plea negotiating was found to be marginal if only unsuccessful motions to eliminate confessions caused in any real sentencing concerns.
