The immediate effect was an outpouring of grief and indignation of a kind rarely if ever experienced in the United States. The emotional impact of the crime was heightened by the fact that it occurred almost immediately after the Civil War had ended. The long-term effect was that the goal of the country's well-being changed. Lincoln's plan was simply to reunite the country not really focused on slaves. Without him, the plan shifted a bit. Hope this helped :))
Answer:
D. All of the above.
Explanation:
A first-time investor refers to an individual such as entrepreneur who is inexperienced but willing to allocate or commit his or her capital in anticipation of an expected financial return or profits in the future.
The following statements indicate smart steps for the first-time investor;
A. Start making "opportunity cost" decisions now. He or she should be willing to give up something nice momentarily for something a lot better in the future. Opportunity cost also known as the alternative forgone, can be defined as the value, profit or benefits given up by an individual or organization in order to choose or acquire something deemed significant at the time.
Simply stated, it is the cost of not enjoying the benefits, profits or value associated with the alternative forgone or best alternative choice available.
B. He or she shouldn't use his or her first credit card to regularly finance any purchases.
C. As a rule, do not ever invest any amount more than you can afford to lose in the event of a downturn.
Apart from the Pendleton Act, another act that tried to get rid of Patronage was the D. Civil Service Act.
<h3>What was the purpose of the Pendleton Act?</h3>
Before the Pendleton Act was passed, the federal civil service operated on a patronage system where people would be hired based on supporting elected officials during campaigns.
This came to an end with the Pendleton Act and the Civil Service Act which called for employment based on merit.
Find out more on the Pendleton Act at brainly.com/question/2695327.
#SPJ1
Answer:
In a confederate system of government, the majority of political power is based on the local government, while the central government has very little power. Local government has the power to act as they wish, which can cause conflicts between states and the central government.
The Confederation represents an alliance between states, reinforced by a common ruling body that has no higher central authority that would give the Confederacy a mark of sovereignty. The Confederation does not have any of the three state governments (legislative, executive, judicial).
Explanation:
The implementation of decisions is made unanimously (which carries a risk of inefficiency) and depends on the will of the member states because they implement decisions.
The Confederation, as a legal relationship between states, has neither a central authority, nor its territory, nor its population. The states sign an international treaty, not a constitution, so member states have both a veto right and a secession right. Therefore, the confederation cannot be even considered as a state, but rather an enhanced form of the alliance between states.
