<span>x=6</span>, <span>x=−5</span> or <span>x=9</span>
Explanation:
<span><span>f<span>(x)</span></span>=<span>(x−6)</span><span>(x+5)</span><span>(x−9)</span></span>
If all of the linear factors are non-zero, then so is their product <span>f<span>(x)</span></span>.
If any of the linear factors is zero, then so is their product <span>f<span>(x)</span></span>.
this would be your answer, <em>x = 1 - 15/2.</em>
Thanks,
<em>Deku ❤</em>
Answer:
the pennies does not conform to the US mints specification
Step-by-step explanation:
z = (variate -mean)/ standard deviation
z= 2.5 - 2.4991 / 0.01648 = 0.0546
we are going to check the value of z in the normal distribution table, which is the table bounded by z.
checking for z= 0.0 under 55 gives 0.0219 (value gotten from the table of normal distribution)
we subtract the value of z from 0.5 (1- (0.5+0.0219)) = 0.4781 > 0.05claim
since 0.4781 > 0.05claim, therefore, the pennies does not conform to the US mints specification
the claim state a 5% significance level whereas the calculated significance level is 47.81%. therefore, the claim should be rejected
We don’t know the value of the shorter side, so we will categorize it as x. Side 2 is just 4 feet longer than x, so we would add 4 on to it. Side 3 has double the x, so we would multiply it be 2 for 2x, and subtract the 4 feet from it.
Side 1: x
Side 2: x + 4
Side 3: 2x - 4
If the perimeter is 64 feet, then all of the sides have to add up to it. Therefore, first we add all of the side lengths up:
x + x + 4 + 2x - 4 = 4x.
Now we put 4x, the amount of all these sides added up, equal to the perimeter of 64.
4x = 64. Divide both sides by 4 to get x by itself.
x = 16.
Now that we know x is 16, we will substitute it in for all the side lengths’ equations.
We know that Side 1 was just x, so that will be 16. Since Side 2 was 4 more than x, we’d do 16 + 4 = 20. We substitute 16 in for x in Side 3’s equation: 2(16) - 4 = 32 - 4 = 28.
Therefore, the final lengths of all the sides are:
Side 1: 16
Side 2: 20
Side 3: 28
