All categories

3 years ago

Why was James I resistant to working with Parliament?

History

2 answers:

Pavlova-9 [17]3 years ago

7 0

James, I resisted working with Parliament as he believed in the absolute power of kings.

Further Explanations:

James, I was the King of England and also the first monarchs of England to rule England till his death. Being a well-educated person he encouraged people of England to take interest in things such as science, arts, and literature. In the case of political prospect, he often had conflicts with the Parliament due to his belief that King should be the Supreme authority. His powers were limited by the implementation of the Bill of rights that led to the establishment of the British Parliament and vested the authority to a committee of 23 representatives. He always believed that the king holds a significant role in Britain, so he always opposed the establishment of Parliament.

His views created a sense of hatred against him in the minds of citizens. A group of Catholics conspirators planned to attack him in a parliamentary ceremony. The plot was put to halt when one of the conspirators, Guy Fawkes was caught in the basement along with barrels of gunpowder.

Learn More

1. which of the following was a religious movement at the turn of the twentieth century that sought justice for the less fortunate?brainly.com/question/2390884

2. in 1972 the wrath of hurricane Agnes resulted in the evacuation of a Pennsylvania town due to the rising water of what river?brainly.com/question/10069321

3. how did henry ford’s model t contribute to the culture of the roaring twenties?

brainly.com/question/7802830

Answer Details:

Grade: High school

Subject: US History

Chapter: Bill of Rights

Keywords: James I, King, England, science, arts, and literature, Parliament, Supreme, authority, Bill of rights, British Parliament, Catholics, conspirators, Guy Fawkes

Harlamova29_29 [7]3 years ago

6 0

The answer is option 4: He believed in the absolute power of kings.

The England King James I (who ruled from 1603 to1625) clashed with the Parliament's ideas several times for his persistent belief in the absolute power of kings, justified for their divine right, which enabled him to rule over all their subjects without interference from anyone. Instead, the Parliament believed that the King must not rule alone, doing all that he pleased.

They both had very different views on how royal finances had to be handled as well as foreign affairs, for example, the Parliament members held that tax collection was an issue that had to be approved by them in order to improve the crown's finances, which had been seriously weakened by the long war with Spain (1585-1604), as for James I, he wanted to collect the taxes on his own, whose purpose wasn't only to improve the government but also to over-spend on his luxury way of living.

You might be interested in

What actions did the pilgrims take to survive the struggles they faced

Leni [432]

They turned away from dangerous weather and asked Squanto for help with food.

6 0

3 years ago

Short writing assignment, please help asap.

Alexandra [31]

Answer:

Trench warfare in World War I was employed primarily on the Western Front, an area of northern France and Belgium that saw combat between German troops and Allied forces from France, Great Britain and, later, the United States. Although trenches were hardly new to combat: Prior to the advent of firearms and artillery, they were used as defenses against attack, such as moats surrounding castles. But they became a fundamental part of strategy with the influx of modern weapons of war.

Long, narrow trenches dug into the ground at the front, usually by the infantry soldiers who would occupy them for weeks at a time, were designed to protect World War I troops from machine-gun fire and artillery attack from the air. As the “Great War” also saw the wide use of chemical warfare and poison gas, the trenches were thought to offer some degree of protection against exposure. (While significant exposure to militarized chemicals such as mustard gas would result in almost certain death, many of the gases used in World War I were still relatively weak.)

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Critically examine the reason for the United States of America departure from Vietnam in 1973

Neko [114]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The reason for the United States of America's departure from Vietnam in 1973 was that President's Nixon administration was already under heavy scrutiny and criticism for maintaining the United States troops installed in South Vietnam.

After very difficult moments such as teh Tet Offensive, the American society in general, and the young Americans in particular, started to seriously question the participation of the United States Army in the Vietnam War, concluding that was not a US war. They started to demand the withdrawal of the US troops from Vietnam and organized many protests and marches to demand action on the part of the federal government.

Finally, in January 1973, a peace agreement was signed and the US started to withdraw its troops. The process lasted until March 29, 1973.

However, the United States contib¿nued to support

South Vietnam, applying the foreign policy of containment to impede the spread of Communist over South Vietnam.

7 0

3 years ago

Why did the two groups fight in the american revolution

vaieri [72.5K]

By 1774, the year leading up to the Revolutionary War, trouble was brewing in America. Parliament (England's Congress) had been passing laws placing taxes on the colonists in America. There had been the Sugar Act in 1764, the Stamp Act the following year, and a variety of other laws that were meant to get money from the colonists for Great Britain. The colonists did not like these laws.
Great Britain was passing these laws because of the French and Indian War, which had ended in 1763. That war, which had been fought in North America, left Great Britain with a huge debt that had to be paid. Parliament said it had fought the long and costly war to protect its American subjects from the powerful French in Canada. Parliament said it was right to tax the American colonists to help pay the bills for the war
Most Americans disagreed. They believed that England had fought the expensive war mostly to strengthen its empire and increase its wealth, not to benefit its American subjects. Also, Parliament was elected by people living in England, and the colonists felt that lawmakers living in England could not understand the colonists' needs. The colonists felt that since they did not take part in voting for members of Parliament in England they were not represented in Parliament. So Parliament did not have the right to take their money by imposing taxes. "No taxation without representation" became the American rallying cry.

4 0

3 years ago

Urdu is the most influential language of pakistan. Do you agree or disagree

yanalaym [24]

Answer:disagree.

Explanation:

Punjabi is the most spoken

8 0

3 years ago