You shouldn't take anyone's advice you should do the research on the tablets to find the best one
Answer:
Inductive, weak
Explanation:
An inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning applies knowledge of past experiences and observations to form conclusions. The premise and conclusion goes "if this happened now... this must then happen". This type of reasoning moves from specific to general as opposed to deductive reasoning that moves from general to specific.
The argument in our question is also a fallacy. A fallacy is a faulty logic or weak argument. The argument is a fallacy of faulty generalization, the typical "jumping into conclusion".
The answer is 2 (two). Based on the given information by the
textbook, an individual can predict that Hoshi will get 2 (two) inches taller
when she turns nine years old. Yet it is still a prediction and we cannot say
that Hoshi may get taller than two inches when she turns nine.
6!
step by step : it’s just 6 lol
Answer:
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Explanation:
