The correct answer would be option B, Can broad jump slightly farther.
By age 5, boys can broad jump slightly farther than girls.
Explanation:
According to researches, there are significant differences in the motor skills of young boys and young girls. Motor skills are the actions that involves the movement of muscles. So when comparing boys and girls on the basis of broad jump, then it is seen that boy's motor skills(muscle movement) is slightly better than the muscle movement of the young girls.
This is the reason that boys can jump lightly farther than girls.
It is believed that the reason why boys have slightly better muscle movement in many fields like batting, skipping, running, etc, is that they have a social pressure on them. Being boys, they are expected to be more powerful since early childhood. That is why they have better motor skills.
Learn more about motor skills at:
brainly.com/question/11854294
brainly.com/question/2523881
#LearnWithBraily
1) there is not a lot of jobs that pay adequate wages
2)the education system is failing
3) people can't access public transport easily
4) health care cost to much
Hope this helps
According to your text, moral hypocrisy is the term Batson and his colleagues (2002) used to describe the tendency to appear moral while avoiding the costs of being so.
The Moral Hypocrisy phenomenon suggests that moral people are often the same people who fail to act morally. While people can see the morally right path, it doesn't guarantee that "moral people" will go to such path.
Answer:
symbolic function substage
Explanation:
<em>Piaget notes a preoperational stage , where a substage called symbolic function stage corresponds to Sally:</em>
<em>Sally is able to represent mentally objects that are not present directly to her, she then gains ability around 2 or 4 years to do so with a inability to distinguis between her view and the view from others.</em>
<em>This was demonstrated as child were asked to portray view from different perspectives and they all showed :egocentrism.</em>
Answer:
the government can clearly justify the restriction
Explanation:
According to the Supreme Court, prior restraint on the press is only acceptable if the government can clearly justify the restriction. Otherwise the government cannot add any restrictions against the press because they have freedom of speech and of the press. Which if violated would cause an uproar of the people and lead to many protests.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
