Direct marketers can use multiple channels to achieve individual and customer prospects: direct email, catalog marketing, telephone marketing, interactive TV, cookies, websites, and mobile devices.
<h3>What do you mean by direct marketing?</h3>
Direct marketing is the use of consumer-specific channels (CDs) to access and deliver goods and services to customers without the use of retailers.
They usually want a measurable response, usually a customer order, for direct order marketing.
Thus, the marketing channel intermediaries are responsible for assisting the direct marketers in the effective functioning of trade.
To learn more about direct marketers refer:
brainly.com/question/26282268
#SPJ1
Answer:
1. Becase it was collapsing from the inside.
Explanation:
Answer:Emotional contagion
Explanation:Emotional contagion is the phenomenon of being influenced by someone else emotion or where someone else's emotions evokes the same emotions from the individuals around them. It can be direct or indirect sometimes just by conscious imagining and analysing another person's emotions we may begin to feel what they feel.
This can create emotional synchrony between people which strengthen the relationship.
Example of emotional contagion is when you find your friend crying it is likely that you will also beging to feel sad and might even cry too.
A person who will get alienation must have done something horribly wrong to get this.
a person who will get job dissatisfaction must have most likely not completed the job or done the job wrong.
there's a difference but a minor one.
someone did something really bad to get alienated.
someone did something still bad but could be fixed and is acceptable to some measures. (more like a warning)
In 2013, the Supreme Court made a ruling in the Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin case that the college must show compelling evidence that racial preferences are justified as one of the admissions criteria.
<h3>In Davis v. UT Austin, what decision did the Supreme Court make?</h3>
In Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin (Fisher), the U.S. Supreme Court (the "Court") decided on June 23, 2016, by a vote of 4-3 that the university's race-conscious admissions policy complied with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In its 2013 decision in Davis v. Texas, which remanded the case to the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court set high requirements for affirmative action policies, saying that colleges could only take race into account when making admissions decisions if they could provide a "reasoned, principled explanation" for wanting a diverse student body.
To know more about University of Texas refer to: brainly.com/question/2437326
#SPJ4
