The answer is D. flashback, to give the reader background
information. It is a literary device wherein the author depicts the incident of
specific events to the reader, or events that have happened before the events
that are currently unfolding in the story which have taken place before the
present time the narration is following,.
The available options are:
A. China took this action to control all trade along the Silk Road.
B. China took this action to encourage its citizens to fight again Mongol invaders.
C. China took this action at the demand of Confucian scholars who tired of barbarian contact.
D. China took this action to eliminate the migration of Chinese people to other parts of the world.
Answer:
China took this action at the demand of Confucian scholars who tired of barbarian contact
Explanation:
What demonstrates that china stopped trading with other areas of the world and became isolated due to fear of cultural change is that "China took this action at the demand of Confucian scholars who tired of barbarian contact".
During this period, the Chinese Scholars felt that the people of their outside regions were uncultured and barbaric hence they must stay away from them so they won't affect their unique way of life.
Answer:
Parents often underestimate the signs of depression notify by their children
Explanation:
Hello! It is better to listen to what the patient feels since parents can contaminate the reality with their vision of how they see their child's behaviors and the opinion of mental health in general. Often, they may be wrong and that does not help to form a diagnosis.
Thanks for your question! Please feel free to ask more!
Answer: In 1995.
Explanation:
Hope This Helps!!! : )
Have A Good Day/Night Keep On Smiling!!! : )
Answer:The Statute is an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause.
Explanation:The Statute is an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause. Regulation of foreign commerce is exclusively a federal power because of the need for the federal government to speak with one voice when regulating commercial relations with foreign governments. The existence of legitimate state interests underlying state legislation will not justify state regulation of foreign commerce. The state statute, in imposing requirements for a license costing $50 and for a clear marking of goods as being from a foreign country, clearly is an attempt by the state to restrict or even eliminate the flow of such goods in foreign commerce. Thus, the statute is unconstitutional.
