They both get payed, they both help the community, they both deal with pretty gross things as well.
If your asking where he lives he could live In North Korea
I believe the answer is The bank secrecy Act.
Prior to this act, the government cannot (under any circumstances) force banks to Record information about any transactions made by certain organizations/individuals.
This act force the banks to made the record if the amount surpasses $10,000 in order to prevent money laundering.
Answer:
Being a form of dishonesty, political corruption implies that those who are entrusted with power over people, here the Russian czar family over, become influenced by others who seek to satisfy their own gain, here Rasputin. While, it may not necessarily harm the people at all times, political corruption creates a channel of influence over the the political figures, which would most likely to be abused but the third parties.
In particular, Rasputin was accused of taking financial bribes and saxual favors from third party actors in order to exercise his power of the czar family and thus help these actors to get what they were seeking.
It's definitely not in a theocracy: those usually favour the majorities.
Also migrant labors don't specifically favour minorities.
Now, between democracies and command economies the choice is very hard, as it depends more on the specific country. So for example in many places the role of the minorities rose in command economies, since they went against the patriarchy (in China this was the case for example, the role of women in China improved drastically, while women and minorities are still struggling in Japan, which is a democracy). On the other hand, Nazi Germany was also a command economy, and yet it was very bad for minorities
I would say that the question is too complex to give just one answer, but I would also argue for option d)
