Answer:
Suppose an abundance of hunting decreases the number of foxes in the ecosystem. Which of the following is the most likely impact of this decline in the fox population?
Once there is abundance decrease in hunting number of foxes in the ecosystem, there would be an increase in the population of foxes as a result of increase in birth rate and no death rate recorded, once there is unavailability in either predator and prey relationship it would benefit one, just as in the case of foxes mentioned above, since there is decrease in hunting number, hence; increases in number of foxes population
Explanation:
Answer:
Chimpanzees
Explanation:
Chimpanzees are much more closely related to humans in an evolutionary sense that cows are. Chimpanzees and humans are both primates, characterized by features like advanced cognition, grasping hands and feet, and front facing eyes. In contrast, cows belong to a different of bovine animals.
Because we are evolutionary more related to chimpanzees, that means our DNA has undergone less change over evolutionary time. That means that the sequence will be more similar to chimps
So to sum up, when matter is transitioning from solid to liquid (melting) or liquid to solid (freezing<span>), its </span>temperature<span> is fixed at the </span>melting/freezing<span> point, which is the </span><span>same temperature</span>
Answer:
The Linnaean system is based on similarities in obvious physical traits. It consists of a hierarchy of taxa, from the kingdom to the species. Each species is given a unique two-word Latin name. The recently added domain is a larger and more inclusive taxon than the kingdom.
Explanation:
brainleist please
