Answer:
The ethics of social consequences is a means of satisficing non-utilitarian consequentialism that can be used to approach disaster issues. The primary values in the ethics of social consequences are humanity, human dignity and moral rights, and these are developed and realized to achieve positive social consequences.Utilitarianism tells you to maximize utility; consequentialism, to maximize good consequences. In other words, a utilitarian who denies that what she should maximize, total utility, is identical to good consequences, is a non-consequentialist utilitarian. Such a utilitarian can be consistent.
Answer:
hmmm
Explanation:
becaus they are too defficult to say it
Mainly through ideas of Manifest Destiny, the idea that settlers had a god given right to expand with the manifest destiny. after the Louisiana purchase, the US bought land previously owned by the French. We made a purchase of the land, thus it was believed the land was ours, even if others were living on it. plus, the government of the time gave rewards in the land, for fighting the civil war. After the gold rush, more were expanding west for personal wealth, it became a common way of life. Much like the saying if everyone was jumping off a cliff would you, everyone was doing it, so many would not have found it hard to live on land that may have not truly been there's.
