Answer:
d. When calcium chloride reacts with water, the temperature changes.
Explanation:
A scientist makes the claim that chemicals like calcium chloride contain energy. The evidence that supports this claim is that when calcium chloride reacts with water, the temperature changes.
The change in the temperature itself is an evidence of the presence of energy. Energy is said to change the temperature and in the calcium chloride solution, the change in temperature indicates that energy is produced.
I believe they go up because for supplies to be limited, people must be buying that product. So it makes sense once the products are limited, the prices will go up because either way the people are buying. Maybe even more now, more abundantly and faster because the product is limited.
Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.
His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.
The same D. <u>neurotransmitter </u>have different effects depending on the properties of the <u>receptor</u>.
<h3>How are neurotransmitters affected by receptors?</h3>
Neurotransmitters are used to transmit information and commands from the brain to the other organs and systems in the body as well as information from these organs and systems, back to the brain. The Neurotransmitters are able to do this tanks to receptors which open or close to allow the information to pass through.
There are different Neurotransmitters but a single Neurotransmitter can do or have different effects based on the properties of the receptor that it passes through. These receptors have different properties based on the proteins available in them which is why they are different. Therefore, the effect that the Neurotransmitter has will depend on how the receptor opens or closes to allow the flow of impulses and information thereby allowing a single Neurotransmitter to have different roles.
Options for this question include:
- A. receptor; neurotransmitter
- B. substrate; receptor
- C. hormone; neurotransmitter
- D. neurotransmitter; receptor
- E. propagation; neurotransmitter
Find out more on Neurotransmitters at brainly.com/question/26387085
#SPJ1
Answer:
Correct answer is They wanted to remain loyal to the king.
Explanation:
First and last options are not correct because the colonist didn't wanted war and were trying to prevent any further conflict.
Second option is not correct as they didn't wanted to change Parliament, but someone who would represent their interests in the same.
Third option is correct as they wanted to show their allegiance to the king, but also asked him to take into consideration the problems that were tormenting them.