1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Shalnov [3]
3 years ago
15

Which civilization lived in elaborate cliff dwellings?

History
2 answers:
Semenov [28]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer to this question is:

Anasazi

They lived during the 13th century (A.D) in the Mesa Verde region.

Vanyuwa [196]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Anasazi

Explanation:

The Anasazi lived in large cities built into a cliff.

You might be interested in
Could yall please help me with this I'm having troubles I WILL GIVE U THE BLANLIEST
Salsk061 [2.6K]

Answer:

advise

Explanation:

The cabinet is made up of secretaries who advise the president on different things.

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best defines the term migrant worker? A. a person who migrates among different jobs throughout the year B
Artist 52 [7]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the 'Trail of Tears' prevail on the face of society?
solniwko [45]

Answer:

Many Reasons...

Explanation:

The Trail of Tears was a horrid act by the USA's government. The southerners were hungry for power, and that greatly impacted American History. The migration of the Cherokees opened land to southern cotton farmers, boosting cotton production and an increase of the American economy. Therefore, increasing the south's political power.

5 0
3 years ago
Letter from Birmingham Jail Assignment
solniwko [45]

Answer:

Considering the context of its creation, the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is remarkably restrained in tone. Throughout his career, many critics of Dr. King argued that he was too deferential to the white authorities that facilitated segregation and other racist policies, but the tone here seems to serve several purposes. First, it conforms to his ultimate purpose of justifying his cause as being in the name of justice. He does not wish to validate his audience’s deep-seeded fears - that the black movement is an extremist set that will engender violence. Therefore, by utilizing restraint, he earns a sympathetic ear to which he then declares his proud embrace of extremism and tension. His difficult arguments end up practically unimpeachable precisely because he has presented them through logos as well as through pathos. However, the restraint also allows him to reinforce one of the letter’s central themes, the interconnectedness of man. There are times when he distinguishes himself and his cause from that of his opponents, particularly in terms of race. However, he for the most part suggests that all men are responsible for all others, an idea that would not be as effective if the tone of the argument was too fiery and confrontational.

Explanation:

Considering it was written in a situation so infused with racial issues, the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is often strangely divorced from explicitly racial issues. Obviously, Dr. King cannot avoid the topic, but much of his argument, especially in the letter’s first half, is presented in universalist terms and through abstractions like “justice” and the interrelatedness of man. He argues that the clergymen, and his larger audience, should support his cause not because the victims are black but because it is the right thing to do. However, this passionate but restrained argument ultimately sets the stage for a declaration of what scholar Jonathan Rieder calls “a proclamation of black self-sufficiency” (94). Once he establishes the definitions of justice and morality, Dr. King argues that the black man will succeed with or without the help of white moderates because they operate with the just ideals of both secular America and divine guidance. Further, he implicitly suggests that by continuing to facilitate the oppression of the black man through moderation, his audience is operating in sin and will ultimately be on the losing side.

In Dr. King’s argument, moderation is a reflection of the moderate’s ignorant and unwitting sinfulness. In terms of the former, the white moderate operates under an illusion that patience will be more effective towards ending segregation than tension will be. Through a variety of legally-structured arguments, Dr. King illustrates the fallacy of both these assumptions. He argues that moderation is but a handy disguise for cowards who fear upsetting the status quo more than desire to pursue justice. However, because he stipulates that his audience is ostensibly interested in the virtue of justice, he argues that moderation allows them license to live in a sinfulness of inaction. To view the suffering of others but to remain silent facilitates a world where men are “separate,” which he equates with sinfulness. Through a variety of unambiguous comparisons – the just crusader to Jesus, and the moderates to those who did not protect the Jews of Nazi Germany – Dr. King decries moderation as the largest obstacle towards equal rights in America at the time.

One recurring idea that supports Dr. King’s arguments is that group mentality supports and enables immorality, and that the individual must therefore act for justice even when the group does not share that goal. He makes this point explicitly in the early part of the “Letter.” This argument supports his defense of civil disobedience, allows him to criticize the church for supporting the status quo rather than empowering crusaders for change, and supports the idea that law must reflect morality since it might otherwise be designed solely for the comfort of the majority. Overall, the discussion of group immorality supports his purpose of encouraging individual action in the face of injustice, and criticizing those who do not support such individual action for fear of upsetting the status quo.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Armenian Genocide fit into the story of WWI?
konstantin123 [22]

Answer:

World War I offered the Young Turk dictatorship (Committee on Union and Progress; CUP) an opportunity to realize its nationalist aims. Already inclined toward Germany due to economic ties, close relations between the two militaries, and compatible territorial ambitions for a war against Russia, the Young Turk government concluded a secret military agreement with the German government on August 2, 1914, and formally entered the war on the side of the Central Powers on November 11.

Explanation:(some major points of it)

Armenians in Conflict Zones

Forced Labor and Massacres on the Front

Aftermath of World War I

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were some of the problems george washington faced when he became president and how did he solve them?
    5·1 answer
  • As part of his Reconstruction plan, President Johnson thought the South should be treated
    14·2 answers
  • List the causes of American involvement in the Afghan War. Do you believe it was worth American involvement in the War?
    13·1 answer
  • The group of people empowered to make the laws were?
    5·2 answers
  • By the mid-1500s, what had become the main economy of Brazil?​
    8·2 answers
  • Desde cuándo crees que aumento o disminuyo notable y porque motivos crees tú qué ocurrió​
    11·1 answer
  • An author’s use of _____ helps the reader discover what will happen next in the story.<br> asap
    15·2 answers
  • In WWI, the __________________ was slow and unreliable, but effective.
    15·1 answer
  • Describe what you think farm life was like for farmers and their families living in the West during the Westward Expansion perio
    8·1 answer
  • What provoked the U.S.army to attack the Cheyenne and arapaho ?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!