Answer:
![\text{c) }\sqrt[4]{64}=2\sqrt[4]{4}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctext%7Bc%29%20%7D%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B64%7D%3D2%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B4%7D)
Step-by-step explanation:
![\text{a) }64\qquad\text{an integer; not a surd}\\\\\text{b) }\sqrt[6]{64}=2\qquad\text{an integer; not a surd}\\\\\text{c) }\sqrt[4]{64}=2\sqrt[4]{4}\qquad\textbf{a surd}\\\\\text{d) }\sqrt[3]{64}=4\qquad\text{an integer; not a surd}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctext%7Ba%29%20%7D64%5Cqquad%5Ctext%7Ban%20integer%3B%20not%20a%20surd%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Ctext%7Bb%29%20%7D%5Csqrt%5B6%5D%7B64%7D%3D2%5Cqquad%5Ctext%7Ban%20integer%3B%20not%20a%20surd%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Ctext%7Bc%29%20%7D%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B64%7D%3D2%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B4%7D%5Cqquad%5Ctextbf%7Ba%20surd%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Ctext%7Bd%29%20%7D%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B64%7D%3D4%5Cqquad%5Ctext%7Ban%20integer%3B%20not%20a%20surd%7D)
Plotting the data (attached photo) roughly shows that the data is skewed to the left. In other words, data is skewed negatively and that the long tail will be on the negative side of the peak.
In such a scenario, interquartile range is normally the best measure to compare variations of data.
Therefore, the last option is the best for the data provided.
I should say 5 is the most clearest answer to me
46 because if the age of the son was 8 then the father was 24 and if we add 8 (because that’s how many years passed) we get 16 and 32 which fit the criteria so if we take off 1 year on each (because only 7 years pass instead of 8) we can add them together and get 46