The following sentence contains a(n)<u> adverb</u> clause. We moved because our house was too small.
Adverbs are words that modify (explain) a verb (singing out loud), an adjective (very loud), another adverb (ending too fast), or the entire sentence (luckily bringing an umbrella). Adverbs often end with -ly, but some (such as Schnell) look exactly like adjective adverbs.
Adverbs can also change adjectives and other adverbs. Often, the purpose of adverbs is to add some strength to the adjective.
You can use an adverb to write another adverb. You can use more than one if you prefer. Some adverbs can change the whole sentence-of course, these are called sentence adverbs. Fortunately, the commonly used ones are interesting and well included.
Learn more about Clauses here: brainly.com/question/541212
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
- Yes, it is important to have literacy in order for a population to become successful. It provides an easier method of sharing of knowledge between individuals.
- A lack of literacy can cause difficulties sharing knowledge throughout a population, leading to confusion and lack of understanding between each other.
- Some techniques to create a literate society is the schooling and teaching of how to read and write.
- I'm not quite sure how a 'distraction' could keep a society illiterate.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
You would use <em>was</em>.
Explanation:
Using "were" in this sense, while it <em>is</em> past tense, doesn't make sense. It is not grammatically correct. If you notice "lunch" is not plural, meaning "were" would not fit it. You would use "was" for it to be grammatically correct.
Here's what the sentence would look like if you used <em>were</em>: "Lunches for the guests were prepared yesterday."
If you were to use "was", the sentence would be: "Lunch for the guests was prepared yesterday.", because the "lunch" is singular. Making <u>this</u> the correct sentence.
I hope this helps!
(Sorry for the mess up!)
-No one
D, because it is the only point that the counter-argument can address.
