False
you wount die right away after being diagonsed
Answer:
In Pavlov's classic study on classical conditioning, the bell was the <u>neutral stimulus </u>before conditioning and the <u>conditioned stimulus</u> after conditioning had occurred (option C).
Explanation:
Classical conditioning, proposed by Ivan Pavlov, establishes that two stimuli -one unconditioned that produces a response and one neutral- when associated, convert the neutral stimulus into a conditioned one with a response.
Pavlov's famous dog experiment laid the foundations of classical conditioning:
- A dog is capable of salivating at the sight of food.
- The same dog does not react to a bell.
- When the dog is shown the food and the bell rings, in repeated opportunities, the only sound of the bell will make it salivate, what is a conditioned response.
The bell, a neutral stimulus, and salivation have become a conditioned stimulus and response, respectively.
Regarding other options:
<em> a. A conditioned stimulus does not lead to an unconditioned one.
</em>
<em> b. A neutral stimulus does not result in reinforcement.
</em>
<em> c. Pavlov's experiment did not demonstrate the conversion of a conditioned stimulus into a neutral stimulus.</em>
The stress is coming from the daily activity
These fitness activity programs are of vital importance in generating bone and muscular strength as well as preventing disease.
<h3>What are the benefits of these programs?</h3>
These programs can be used to strengthen bones in order to prevent the likelihood of fractures or broken bones in the future. The increased muscular mass generated by these programs is also a key benefit. Perhaps the most important benefit is that careful exercise has been proven to prevent many kinds of disease.
Therefore, given the major health benefits in combating disease and generating strong bones and a high muscular mass for all parties involved, we can confirm that <u>muscle-bone-strengthening activities programs</u> are of vital importance.
To learn more about fitness visit:
brainly.com/question/4954992?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
The correct answer is - a conflict between self-determination and the right to confidentiality.
Explanation:
An ethical dilemma is or conflict between two or more moral imperatives or principles in which not a single one is acceptable or preferable. In this scenario, Paul is in a conflict between self-determination as a social worker and the right to the confidentiality of his client and his problems.
If he prefers anyone the moral imperatives he will lose or harm his other moral value so it is an ethical conflict or dilemma.
