Answer:
Animism
Explanation:
Animism is the belief or perception that inanimate objects posses life or have a distinct spiritual essence. For instance, some individuals believe that rocks, animals, plants and other inanimate objects are alive, it can also be linked to some believes in certain religions.
Animism can be found among children mostly preschoolers; they give animated qualities to non living objects, like their teddy bears or even books.
In the case of this boy, he believes he was hit by the wall because the wall had life in it, that was why he felt he needed to be angry at the wall for making him fall down.
The answer is friends. The awarding of government jobs to political supporters and friends. Hope it helped you, and have a great day.
Answer:
Cleaning Your Room.
Explanation:
I highly doubt that cleaning your room is a game, as a game constitutes something that is fun that people will enjoy, and cleaning your room is usually something that is least enjoyable in the eyes of many, so to speak.
~
Answer:
The nativist theory of language
Explanation:
The nativist theory of language is associated with Noam Chomsky. It proposes that children are born with a knowledge of general rules of syntax that determine how sentences are constructed. Language develops as long as the infant is exposed to it.
Explanation:
The witness's testimony is inadmissible.
Under Federal Rule 804(b)(1), the testimony of a witness who is unavailable, given at another hearing, is admissible in a subsequent trial if there is sufficient similarity of parties and issues so that the opportunity to develop testimony or cross-examination at the prior hearing was meaningful.
The former testimony is admissible upon any trial of the same subject matter. The party against whom the testimony is offered or, in civil cases, the party's predecessor in interest must have been a party in the former action. "Predecessor in interest" includes one in a privity relationship with the party, such as grantor-grantee, testator-executor, life tenant-remainder man, and joint tenants.
These requirements are intended to ensure that the party against whom the testimony is offered (or a predecessor in interest in a civil case) had an adequate opportunity and motive to cross-examine the witness.
In the civil suit here at issue, the survivors of the victim were not parties to the criminal case, nor were they in privity with any such party. (The parties to that case were the defendant and the government.) These survivors, who are the plaintiffs in the instant litigation, are the parties against whom the testimony of the witness is being offered. Because they were not parties to the action in which the witness testified, they had no opportunity to cross-examine him. Even if the government had a similar motive to cross-examine the witness as do the plaintiffs in the current action, that is not sufficient to make the government a predecessor in interest to the plaintiffs. Consequently, the testimony of the witness does not come within the former testimony exception to the hearsay rule, and the testimony is inadmissible hearsay.
A victim and his former business.
