Answer:
√You would not walk away while someone was talking without saying anything → to explain how one can strengthen personal relationships.
√This habit is hurting relationships and shortening attention spans → to explain why attention to one's phone can hurt relationships.
√Without eye contact, it is nearly impossible to be fully engaged in the conversation → to provide a solution to the problem of preoccupation with cell phones.
Explanation:
I have been able to match the purpose of each statement from the text to the text statement itself.
The text statement in the 1st tile actually explains how one can strengthen personal relationships. The habit of walking away from people will strain relationships. The text statement in the 2nd tile explains that if one is obsessed with his phone without giving attention to people, it can actually hurt relationships. The text statement in the 3rd title actually provides a solution to the problem of preoccupation with cell phones which says that eye contact is necessary and without it, one cannot fully engage in a conversation.
<span>Jerome feels ambivalent towards his father.
Greene’s works focus on survival. The reader most logically infer that Greene’s
personal history informs his writing. The author uses Jerome’s apprehensive
attitude to characterize Sally as unfeeling. Jerome’s active imagination
regarding the pig is what the Greene use to characterize Jerome. Therefore, C, B, A, B, D</span>
False. A paradox is an impossible question, something that is self-contradicting.
The answer is b, are.
The reason is because it is the only one that fits in the sentence that makes sense!
I am not that good at writing tasks. And I really doubt that I can help you with your speech. You may turn to the writing service I like. The guys from Marvelous Essay will do their best to prepare your speech on time. Check it
