1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
amid [387]
3 years ago
10

How might Aristotle reply to the claim that individuals should be free to pursue their own conceptions of the good life and that

participating in politics is only one life option among many? a) Participating in politics, broadly conceived as the practice of deliberation, is actually the condition for the ability to pursue one’s own conception of the good life. b) One can only achieve the good by receiving the highest honors in the city. c) Although the state should guide people’s life choices, it should not enforce any conception of the good through law. d) One should avoid participating in politics only if it detracts from one’s happiness. e) All of the above.
Law
2 answers:
Scilla [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: A

Explanation:

stich3 [128]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Correct Answer:

e) All of the above.

Explanation:

Aristotle, as one of the greatest philosopher ever lived wrote discusses on various aspect of life. One of them was his works on good life. According to him, good life is one in which a person cultivates and exercises their rational faculties which could be engaging in scientific inquiry, philosophical discussion, artistic creation, or legislation. This is because,what separate humans from animals is the human reason to rationalize things.

You might be interested in
Many European nations offer government services that are not offered in the United States. In order to do this, they require the
Anarel [89]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Many European nations offer government services that are not offered in the United States. In order to do this, they require their citizens to pay higher taxes. The United States doesn't follow the same system because in Europe the governments invest in offering affordable services to the citizens, trying to consider the necessities of the poor. There are social programs aimed to facilitate health services and other services so much needed for the medium and low class.

In the United States, many services are seen as a business, Private companies offer the services but as a business to make a profit, not thinking about the necessities of less favored or poor. Depending on the political party in power, sometimes there are social programs to help the people, as in the case of the Democratic administration that raises more taxes to fund these programs. On the other hand, when the Republicans run the government, they do not like to raise more taxes to fund social programs. They think that people have to pay for the services they need.

4 0
2 years ago
What does the Supreme Court have the power to do?
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer:

A lot!

Explanation:

Supreme Court Background

Article III of the Constitution establishes the federal judiciary. Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it. Congress first exercised this power in the Judiciary Act of 1789. This Act created a Supreme Court with six justices. It also established the lower federal court system.

The Justices

Over the years, various Acts of Congress have altered the number of seats on the Supreme Court, from a low of five to a high of 10. Shortly after the Civil War, the number of seats on the Court was fixed at nine. Today, there is one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices of the United States Supreme Court. Like all federal judges, justices are appointed by the President and are confirmed by the Senate. They, typically, hold office for life. The salaries of the justices cannot be decreased during their term of office. These restrictions are meant to protect the independence of the judiciary from the political branches of government.

The Court's Jurisdiction

Article III, Section II of the Constitution establishes the jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) of the Supreme Court. The Court has original jurisdiction (a case is tried before the Court) over certain cases, e.g., suits between two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers. The Court has appellate jurisdiction (the Court can hear the case on appeal) on almost any other case that involves a point of constitutional and/or federal law. Some examples include cases to which the United States is a party, cases involving Treaties, and cases involving ships on the high seas and navigable waterways (admiralty cases).

Cases

When exercising its appellate jurisdiction, the Court, with a few exceptions, does not have to hear a case. The Certiorari Act of 1925 gives the Court the discretion to decide whether or not to do so. In a petition for a writ of certiorari, a party asks the Court to review its case. The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year.

Judicial Review

The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).

In this case, the Court had to decide whether an Act of Congress or the Constitution was the supreme law of the land. The Judiciary Act of 1789 gave the Supreme Court original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus (legal orders compelling government officials to act in accordance with the law). A suit was brought under this Act, but the Supreme Court noted that the Constitution did not permit the Court to have original jurisdiction in this matter. Since Article VI of the Constitution establishes the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, the Court held that an Act of Congress that is contrary to the Constitution could not stand. In subsequent cases, the Court also established its authority to strike down state laws found to be in violation of the Constitution.

Before the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment (1869), the provisions of the Bill of Rights were only applicable to the federal government. After the Amendment's passage, the Supreme Court began ruling that most of its provisions were applicable to the states as well. Therefore, the Court has the final say over when a right is protected by the Constitution or when a Constitutional right is violated.

Role

The Supreme Court plays a very important role in our constitutional system of government. First, as the highest court in the land, it is the court of last resort for those looking for justice. Second, due to its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power. Third, it protects civil rights and liberties by striking down laws that violate the Constitution. Finally, it sets appropriate limits on democratic government by ensuring that popular majorities cannot pass laws that harm and/or take undue advantage of unpopular minorities. In essence, it serves to ensure that the changing views of a majority do not undermine the fundamental values common to all Americans, i.e., freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and due process of law.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the different types of courts in America and what authority do they have?
dmitriy555 [2]

Answer:The federal court system has three main levels: district courts (the trial court), circuit courts which are the first level of appeal, and the Supreme Court of the United States, the final level of appeal in the federal system.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Describe and explain three benefits of writing a police report.
Gwar [14]

Answer:  A well-written report can prove more efficient in a court of law, speaking more logically and correctly to lawyers and judges. Possible avoidance of court: A report that leaves little material for questioning could help an officer avoid having to attend court at all.

Explanation: A police report must include four basic characteristics to be useful and understandable by those using the report. These include: accuracy, completeness, conciseness and clarity.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Individuals who send law enforcement agencies information via social media are referred to as
Amiraneli [1.4K]

Individuals who send law enforcement agencies information via social media are referred to as Citizen journalists.

<h3>What is Citizen journalists?</h3>

Citizen journalists are the phrase that is used to define a people that report information to law enforcement agencies with the help of social media.

Under this approach, Peoples can be evaluated and acknowledged on a worldwide scale through citizen journalism. The transmission of message and news does not totally reveal accurate orientations of current events.

Therefore, option B is correct.

Learn more about the Citizen journalists, refer to:

brainly.com/question/10160256

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • If you're required to wear glasses or contact lenses, it's a good idea to _____.
    8·2 answers
  • What did the Founding Fathers have in mind when they created a shared power system?
    15·1 answer
  • What is the highest standard applied to laws that legally distinguish between two groups of people?
    7·2 answers
  • Why is the Bill of Rights referred to as the anti-Federalist legacy?The Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution in response
    6·2 answers
  • Juvenile homicide tends to occur most frequently between juvenile and acquaintance
    14·2 answers
  • What are some fun facts about being a lawyer? I'll give brainliest!
    10·2 answers
  • hasta donde es ético o no la labor que cumplen el gobierno (poder ejecutivo) y la mayoría de los integrantes del congreso nacion
    10·1 answer
  • A duty to do or not to do a certain thing
    9·1 answer
  • Any prich conviction for a felony or a misdemeanor crime of dishonesty can be used
    10·1 answer
  • Why do some states leave it up to cities and counties to determine requirements for private security guards?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!