Answer:
United States Supreme Court case in which the Court instituted an exclusionary rule exception allowing evidence obtained through a warrant less search to be valid when a police record erroneously indicates the existence of an outstanding warrant due to negligent conduct of a Clerk of Court.
Explanation:
With the case study given above, it may be ascertained that,
- The want to avoid 'The CSI Effect' is a non-discriminatory reason to eliminate the jurors in general, as it does not conflict to any social discrimination based upon gender, race or other such factors;
- Furthermore, it is to be assumed that 'The CSI Effect' is directly tied to age as per the beliefs of Angela, and involves social discrimination based on the age of jurors.
<h3>What is social discrimination?</h3>
Any discriminative act, which directly relates to a biased behavior based upon the factors such as age, race, gender, ethnicity, and other such factors contained under Constitution lead to social discrimination.
As per the beliefs of Angela, her act of wanting to avoid 'The CSI Effect' conflicts a social discrimination for young jurors only, and not in general, as it is a discrimination of age.
Hence, the significance of social discrimination is aforementioned.
Learn more about social discrimination here:
brainly.com/question/13964317
#SPJ1
To get rid of your partner using poison
Answer:
Oh wow, well your in quite the predicament here Thailor, wish I could help you truly I do. But um I don't believe that they can make you come back, since your of legal age and have your own free will they actually can't make you do anything. Your parents no longer have legal control over you since your 18 therefore you can live as a normal adult.
Explanation:
That's all I have on this for now though.
I believe the answer should be D.
The equal protection law was made so everyone would be treated equally and prohibits discrimination based on race, gender, religion, etc.
pls vote brainliest :)
