1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
finlep [7]
4 years ago
10

The problem with saying something hurtful during a heated conflict is that you can damage your relationships because you ______.

a. Have to let the other person speak b. Won’t win your argument c. Can’t take back what you’ve said d. Shouldn’t try to convince people you’re right
History
2 answers:
topjm [15]4 years ago
6 0
<span>C. Can't take back what you've said. During a heated conflict, flared tempers often lead people to say things that may not necessarily be true but inflammatory all the same. In most cases each side will continue to say more hurtful things until the emotional damage caused is too much to bear or one party decides to back down thereby reducing the emotional instability in the scenario.</span>
tester [92]4 years ago
5 0
<span>The problem with saying something hurtful during a heated conflict is that you can damage your relationships because you is letter C, you can't take back what you have said. That is why you think before you speak to avoid someone to get hurt or for you to avoid conflict. </span>
You might be interested in
BEST ANSWER GETS BRAINLEIST 20 PTS
AlekseyPX

Hello Bunny Pop! 


Here is your answer


When the United States entered World War I in 1917, Germans were the single largest ethnic group in Minnesota. Nativism during this period was a “patriotic” attitude that saw recent immigrants—particularly those of German descent— as potentially traitorous. Many felt that because German Americans shared their heritage with the Kaiser and the German Empire, they would side with the enemy power. That many German Americans advocated neutrality until the U.S. declared war was further proof of disloyalty to nativists.

The most conspicuous nativist agency was the Minnesota Commission of Public Safety (MCPS). Created by the state legislature in April of 1917, the MCPS was a seven-person commission headed by Governor J. A. A. Burnquist. It was given near-dictatorial powers to support the war effort at home and root out disloyal elements. While much of the commission’s activity focused on attacking labor advocates and political dissenters in the Nonpartisan League and the Industrial Workers of the World, the MCPS kept a close watch on German Americans as well. There was, in fact, much cross-over between these two groups, since many German Americans were both socialists and pacifists.

The MCPS took drastic action in dealing with a gathering in New Ulm on July 25, 1917. The meeting was organized by Brown County Auditor Louis Vogel, Mayor Dr. Louis Fritsche, and city attorney Albert Pfaender. Its agenda was to discuss the constitutionality of the draft. The MCPS and its agents already suspected Pfaender and Fritsche of sedition. A month later, Burnquist had them both deposed.

Another victim of the July 25 rally was Adolph Ackermann, president of Dr. Martin Luther College. During the demonstration, he gave a speech questioning the government’s motive for entering the war. In response to his comments, the MCPS coerced the college to force Ackermann’s resignation.

Nativism sometimes served personal and business interests. After Fritsche was removed from office, the MCPS pressured the State Medical Society and the Brown–Redwood County Society to revoke the ex-mayor’s medical certification. Two doctors on the review panel who voted against Fritsche ran practices in Springfield, a town in keen business competition with New Ulm. Fritsche was eventually exonerated.

Another vested-interest case unfolded in Springfield, where mostly German American stakeholders proposed creating a new bank. The president of the existing State Bank of Springfield submitted the names of those stakeholders to the MCPS to investigate their loyalty.

Some members of the Catholic Church also stood to benefit from anti-German policies. Archbishop John Ireland had long promoted the “Americanization” of the Church. During the war, this attitude gained ground. The archbishop urged that English should be the only language of church liturgy—a move that alienated German Catholics and their clergy, who conducted mass in German. This division allowed many Irish Catholics to assume leadership positions at the expense of their German counterparts.

The German-language press was an obvious target. The MCPS kept a close eye on many of these publications. Albert Steinhauser, publisher of the New Ulm Post and the New Ulm Review, featured many German articles in his papers that criticized the war. Under pressure from the commission, he was arrested and expelled from the Minnesota State Editorial Association in 1918. Even more severe, federal authorities jailed Volkszeitung editor Frederick W. Bergmeier of St. Paul for the duration of the war.

German Minnesotans responded to nativism in different ways. While many spoke their minds and suffered, others kept quiet and out of sight. Some became vehement and vocal “patriots” or “100% Americans” in order to deflect suspicion. A few even spied on other Germans for the MCPS. The replacements for both Fritsche and Pfaender were themselves German Americans. Bishop Busch, the stalwart “Americanizer,” was of Austrian stock.

The MCPS and other officials both represented and sanctioned a general culture of fear and hostility against German Americans. Such antagonism manifested itself throughout society at large. Indeed, many of the investigations conducted by the commission were petitioned by private citizens. This created a climate of paranoia and violence. Fritsche and his family, after his disgrace, lived in fear of their well-being and lives; this was by no means unusual for victims of nativism. Nativist Minnesotans boycotted their German neighbors’ stores, vandalized their property, and called for them to resign from their jobs.

When World War I ended, so did much of the MCPS’s justification. It was abolished by legislative act in 1919 and met for the last time in 1920. With the commission’s demise and the end of the war, anti-German nativism lost much of its momentum.


Hope this helps and answers your question. I wish you the best of luck! :) 

6 0
4 years ago
African American political representation
mr Goodwill [35]

Barack Obama took office as the first black president of the United States – a proud moment for many Americans. Obama’s election represented another advance in the slow but steady progress blacks have made in recent decades in gaining a greater foothold in political leadership, particularly in the U.S. House of Representatives and in the Cabinets of recent presidents. But they have procrastinated in the Senate and in governorships. While African-American politicians have held office on the local and state level since Alexander Twilight was elected to the Vermont state legislature in 1836, race discrimination and laws prohibiting African-Americans from voting limited the number of Blacks holding office until the 20th century. Since then many great African-Americans politicians have made their mark on shaping American history and public policy.

4 0
3 years ago
MAX POINTS AMD BRAINLIEST FOR ALL THREE QUESTIONS ANSWERED CORRECTLY
Leni [432]

Answer:

6.I believe it's B! But its blurry on my screen. sorry for the issues! Hope it helps!

7. He wanted to keep food from the disobedient colonists

8. C) written by Thomas Jefferson

E) one section stated grievances against England

one section stated political principles  such as liberty

) one section laid out the structure of the new American government

the author used the ideas of John Locke

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
¿Qué países fueron los principales enemigos de Napoleón? ¿Cuál fue el resultado de las guerras contra estos países?
UkoKoshka [18]

Answer:

djdjshxhsjxjdfbdjcnxj

Explanation:

sjdjedjejfjdjejxjejdwjwsjdjdjxjxjx1234

4 0
3 years ago
Which issues did Populists support?
rodikova [14]

Answer:A,B,C and E

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which event happened last?
    13·1 answer
  • Which two acts did not include a new tax
    6·1 answer
  • What was Bloody Sunday and the Revolution of 1905?
    6·1 answer
  • During ww1 which group of people were victims of genocide
    8·1 answer
  • The face of the American workforce changed dramatically after world war 2 ,which of the following was the factor in this change
    10·1 answer
  • Why must a woman have permission and an escort to attend the Hajj?
    8·2 answers
  • Peter Salem and other African Americans served heroically during the American revolution what values did they share with the pat
    9·1 answer
  • While serving in the Union army, African Americans faced all of the following except
    8·1 answer
  • Wich issues slowed the speed of industrialization in some countries? check all that apply.​
    5·2 answers
  • What is true about the Iroquois Confederacy. a. There were five nations that made up the confederacy.b. The confederacy began a
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!