Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
The given statement belongs to "Uplift modelling" concept.
Explanation:
In analytical CRM Concept
Uplift modeling , customer segmentation and Website personalization are exist.
Uplift Modeling is an observational marketing method that forecasts the variance in the behaviour of consumers of a marketer's actions.
It splits the audience into groups that respond to the marketing camp against a control group based on the expected disparity.
Answer:
I could not find the exact details related to this question so here is a similar question to guide you.
Goodwill = Acquisition Price - Net book value (Investee)
= 75,000 - ( Assets - Liabilities)
= 75,000 - ( 90,000 - 40,000)
= $25,000
Identifiable noncurrent assets is overstated by $10,000 however. This will have to be adjusted for tax and then removed from Goodwill to find the Net goodwill that should be reported in the investor's consolidated balance sheet prepared immediately after this business combination.
= 10,000 ( 1 - 40%)
= $6,000
Net Goodwill = 25,000 - 6,000
<h2>
= $19,000</h2>
Answer:
$17,000
Explanation:
Leker's Old Property Adjusted Tax Basis = $20,000
To calculate the new basis, subtract the $3000 recieved in cash from the new property.
New Tax Basis; $20,000-$3,000= $17,000
The transaction of Leker to exchange a real property for another led to a loss: Meaning a Property of $20,000 was exchanged for a property of $10,000+ $3,000 (cash)= $13,000
The Loss on the transaction= $20,000- $13,000= $7,000
Due to the loss no gain is recognized and the $3000 will reduce the basis for his new asset.
