1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zhenek [66]
4 years ago
15

How did the Peloponnesian War weaken Greek city-states?**PLZ HELP**

History
2 answers:
Allushta [10]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The wealth, prestige, policies, and power of Athens caused resentment among other city-states. A plague that killed many Athenians helped Sparta defeat Athens.

Explanation:

r-ruslan [8.4K]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The wealth, prestige, policies, and power of Athens caused resentment among other city-states. A plague that killed many Athenians helped Sparta defeat Athens.

You might be interested in
Which of the following explains one method the Roman Catholic Church used to unify Europe after the Roman Empire collapsed?
maksim [4K]
B because I just learned this in my World History class yesterday.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the united states join world war ii in 1941?.
Cloud [144]

Answer:

The main reason the US joined WWII was because of the attack on the pearl harbor base in Hawaii.

Explanation:

Hope that helps!

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The difference in the ways that farmers artisans and scribes contributed to the civilization of ancient Egypt is that
algol [13]
Farmers were the ones who provided food for the civilization of ancient Egypt, they were the backbone without which it couldn't exist. 

Artisns were the group of people who provided Egypt with the tools that were needed to function properly. And not only food, clothes and other similar necessities were also provided by them.

Scribes were a class of people who were writing down the history of ancient Egypt and are also the main reason we know so much about this civilization. 
4 0
3 years ago
ANSWER NOWWW PLZZZZ U WILL GET BRAINLIESTTT!!
mina [271]
The answer would be A
7 0
3 years ago
Describe at least two actions taken by Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War. (These can include speeches, policies, decisions, e
Hitman42 [59]

Answer:

Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in January of 1863, about 3 years into the Civil War. The purpose was to strengthen the Union cause which was equality and protecting the black lives in America; and by doing that he declared "that all persons held as slaves.. in the southern states "are, and henceforward shall be free." In addition the purpose was also to shorten the war- he didn't want anymore blood shed on both sides of the spectrum. Without the Emancipation Proclamation the U.S. would have endured a lot more hardship these including many more deaths, an even bigger crash in  economy and many more years of oppression- and protesting that came with it. It is a human right to be free and morally speaking no one should be subjected to someone and further labeled as property that one can sell and obtain. So in short the Emancipation Proclamation laid down the foundation of the Fifteenth Amendment  and entirely change the significance of the war and furthermore shed an importance and a fight for all types of equality in the future.

In November 1863 Abraham Lincoln crafted ( dare a say- * insert Italian chef kiss * ) a call to action speech to ignite social change against black oppression in the southern states. In addition to recognizing social reforms Lincoln furthers his speech as a dedication to the fallen soldiers lost in battle, whether that have been from the Unionists or the Confederates: he gave remembrance and importance to all lives lost in battle. In his Gettysburg Address Lincoln states that the Civil War was an action taken to preserve a government, "for the people by the people for the people." The people would shy away from the role of government if change didn't occur thus it was necessity to accommodate the people of the United States in addition to its motto which states that freedom and justice be served to all no matter race. To be subjected based on uncontrolled circumstances is unjust and morally wrong. Leaders of the so called, "free world," would be hypocrite if they didn't stand by what they said.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did this event impact the Byzantine Empire?
    10·2 answers
  • In 1489, Vasco da gama reached India by sailing around
    13·1 answer
  • What was one effect that mass transit had on American cities?
    14·1 answer
  • What does this map indicate about the dispersion of H1N1 cases in 2009? (5 points
    11·1 answer
  • Which characteristics helped make the Gupta empire a golden age
    8·2 answers
  • Indians and Muslims merged after Muslims accepted Indian rule and government in place of their own.
    10·1 answer
  • Explain how we see Genocide during the Age of Exploration?
    8·1 answer
  • How did Lincoln’s approach to Reconstruction differ from the approach of the Radical Republicans?
    6·1 answer
  • Winston Churchill was born into a wealthy, aristocratic family in Britain. Why did Churchill initially support fascism as a move
    6·2 answers
  • After independence India became a ____________ country where people of different religions and faiths have the freedom to practi
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!