1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
weeeeeb [17]
3 years ago
6

Decided during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, this accommodation onrepresentation in the proposed US House of Representa

tives tacitly acknowledgedslavery and kept the Southern slave states from rejecting the Constitution. It was calleda. the Three-Fifths Compromise.b. the Slavery Compromise.c. the Missouri Compromise.d. the Great Compromise.e. the Connecticut Compromise
Law
1 answer:
miv72 [106K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The correct answer is A. Decided during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, this accommodation onrepresentation in the proposed US House of Representatives tacitly acknowledged slavery and kept the Southern slave states from rejecting the Constitution. It was called the Three-Fifths Compromise.

Explanation:

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached between delegates from the southern states and delegates from the northern states during the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The debate centered on on the fact whether slaves would be counted at the same time as determining the total population of a state to determine legislative representation and for taxative functions. The matter was important, while that population number then used to determine how many seats the state would have in the House of Representatives for the next ten years. The effect was to give the southern states one-third more seats in Congress and one-third more votes they would otherwise have, allowing slave interests to largely dominate the United States government until 1865.

You might be interested in
1. What is Compstat and discuss the four areas it emphasizes?
Kruka [31]

Answer: Compstat emphasizes information-sharing, responsibility and account- ability, and improving effectiveness.

6 0
3 years ago
A legal order for an investigation into whether a person who is arrested has been imprisoned legally defines habeas corpus. tria
podryga [215]

Answer:

Habeas corpus.

Explanation:

Judicial power can be defined as the power given to the courts to act and pronounce judgment on a case after making a decision with respect to the parties that brought the case for litigation.

Therefore, when a judge with competent jurisdiction decides on an issue, his or her decision is final and can only be changed (upturned) by another court ruling.

This ultimately implies that, when a judge presiding over a court of competent jurisdiction gives a verdict or judgment on a case, his or her decision is final and can only be upturned by a higher court such as a court of appeal (appellate court) and supreme court.

A legal order for an investigation into whether a person who is arrested has been imprisoned legally defines habeas corpus.

Additionally, habeas corpus ensures protection for an individual from imprisonment without being charged legally with a crime. The individual reports his or her illegal (unlawful) imprisonment or detention to a court in order to regain freedom.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was not allowed to vote for the new bill of rights
Valentin [98]
The Bill of Rights 1689, also known as the Bill of Rights 1688,[nb 2] is a landmark Act in the constitutional law of England that sets out certain basic civil rights and clarifies who would be next to inherit the Crown. It received the Royal Assent on 16 December 1689 and is a restatement in statutory form of the Declaration of Right presented by the Convention Parliament to William III and Mary II in February 1689, inviting them to become joint sovereigns of England. The Bill of Rights lays down limits on the powers of the monarch and sets out the rights of Parliament, including the requirement for regular parliaments, free elections, and freedom of speech in Parliament.[3] It sets out certain rights of individuals including the prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment and confirmed that "Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law". It also includes no right of taxation without Parliament's agreement. Furthermore, the Bill of Rights described and condemned several misdeeds of James II of England.[
5 0
2 years ago
I tried using poop to make a bowl and it wont work
Ivan

Answer:

Whatt

Explanation:

it didnt work cause poop doesn't get hard fast

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For your motor skills to work properly, they must ...A. receive accurate information.
gtnhenbr [62]

Answer:

A receive accurate information

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the difference between a naturalized citizen and a natural-born citizen?
    5·2 answers
  • . Are there any circumstances in which a person should be released
    14·1 answer
  • What was the subject of the most debate between large and small states at the constitutional convention?
    12·2 answers
  • 4. What do you think is more important, our privacy or national security? Explain your<br> answer.
    9·1 answer
  • HURRRYYY PLEASE
    7·1 answer
  • What is the income threshold for self-employed workers to file a return?
    13·1 answer
  • Why is there no one clear definition for a political conservative
    7·1 answer
  • Which is the biggest difficulty that criminologists face while developing criminological theories
    7·2 answers
  • Which article of the constitution establishes the judicial branch.
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following are indicators of
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!