Question A: Does the conversation in the patrol car between the officer and Harper violate any of his individual Constitutional rights?
<u>Answer:</u> I'm not an expert on this, but I don't think it violates any of Harper's individual Constitutional rights. When you get arrested, the police officer tells you the phrase, <em>"You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law."</em> Essentially, if you confess to a crime to a police officer, that is your fault, because you have the right to remain silent and not say anything. So I would guess that it does not violate any of his individual Constitutional rights.
<u>Hope this helps! Feel free to give me Brainliest if you feel this helped. Have a good day, and good luck on your assignment. :)</u>
Question A: Does the conversation in the patrol car between the officer and Harper violate the Miranda rules? Explain your answer. No. Because he didn't ask a specific question. Question B: Were the police required to notify Harper that his conversation was being recorded? Explain your answer. No because you can film anyone you want without
When being a witness against themselves it means They don’t have to give any results regarding them I think that’s what it means I’m not sure look it up
