1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DiKsa [7]
3 years ago
6

A plaintiff sues her employer for sexual harassment. During the trial, the plaintiff attempts to introduce into evidence company

records that include written complaints from other employees alleging that they too were sexually harassed by the employer. The defense objects to the admission of the records on the basis of hearsay. Should the objection be sustained?
Law
1 answer:
STALIN [3.7K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

no

Explanation:

The evidence is most likely valid and can be useful so the judge shouldn't Sustain it.

You might be interested in
Define and describe human rights violation​
Vesnalui [34]

Answer:

When you can't speak out for your race and who you want to be and how we live our life. Hope this helps.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the difference between the supreme courts and the district courts
sergeinik [125]

Answer:Court Structure

Explanation:The Constitution and laws of each state establish the state courts. A court of last resort, often known as a Supreme Court, is usually the highest court. ... Below these appeals courts are the state trial courts. Some are referred to as Circuit or District Courts.

8 0
3 years ago
100 POINT QUESTION
valina [46]

Answer:

you'd get your 1 cent that your entitled to

Explanation:

Because they don't have the right to take your 1 cent if you want it back but then again it depends on the tax

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1.) If I Can’t Have You. Bertha shot and ki((ed her husband and his lover after discovering them having passion in his car. When
Firlakuza [10]

Answer:

You are the trial judge at the sentencing hearing. If you wish, you can rely on the suppressed confession for a sentence enhancement, in effect imposing the same sentence Bertha would have received for second-degree murder. Should you do so? Why or why not?

b. If you were on the appellate court reviewing Bertha’s sentence imposed as described in (a), would you rule that this sentence is fair?

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is not an affirmative defense
olga2289 [7]
John claims he did not do it
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is considered an important necessity for achieving financial success through legal channels?
    13·2 answers
  • Explain the ceremonial and real executive functions of the president in the presidential system of government
    7·2 answers
  • Descripe two ways in which the law protect citizens against xenophobia​
    7·1 answer
  • For Biden’s and Obama’s inauguration
    14·2 answers
  • Hello i need help with my law
    8·1 answer
  • 4. High-risk drivers habitually deviate from driving norms.<br> T or F<br> Need help please
    10·1 answer
  • How does a stipulation work?​
    9·1 answer
  • Grammarly is trash<br><br><br> 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999+ social credit
    10·1 answer
  • Who killed eren yeager
    8·1 answer
  • Who is responsible for arguing for someone’s innocence in a court of law?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!