Based on my experiences so far, the approach to geometry that I prefer is: Euclidean Geometry. This is because the problems are easy to visualize since they are restricted to two-dimensional planes.
<h3>Which approach is easier to extend beyond two dimensions?</h3>
The approach that is easier to extend beyond two dimensions is Euclidean Geometry. Again, this is because of how it deals with shapes and visualization of the same.
Take for instance a triangle; it is easy to go from a two-dimensional equilateral triangle to a square pyramid.
<h3> What are some situations in which one approach to geometry would prove more beneficial than the other?</h3>
Analytical geometry is a superior technique for discovering objects (points, curves, and planes) based on their qualities in some situations than Euclidean geometry is in others (for example, when employing topography or building charts).
Learn more about Euclidean Geometry at;
brainly.com/question/2251564
#SPJ1
Y>3x+12
y(less than or equal to)-2/3x+9
The function h(t)=6+3ln(t+1) is a logarithmic function
The height of the tree will exceed 18 feet after 53.6 years
<h3>How to determine the number of years?</h3>
The function is given as:
h(t)=6+3ln(t+1)
When the height is 18 feet, we have:
6+3ln(t+1) = 18
Subtract 6 from both sides
3ln(t+1) = 12
Divide both sides by 3
ln(t+1) = 4
Take the exponent of both sides
t + 1 = e^4
Evaluate the exponent
t + 1 = 54.6
Subtract 1 from both sides
t = 53.6
This means that the height of the tree will exceed 18 feet after 53.6 years
Read more about logarithmic functions at:
brainly.com/question/25953978
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer is 54.5 on edg
