Answer:
If I were a bird, I would like to be one of the small species, cute and beautiful.
I would love to be a tiny maina who is beautiful, tiny and above all, it is a bird that man can keep as a pet. I would love to stay with men, study their ways and enjoy their company. This I would be able to do with men as, God has given the maina a power of speech just like men. It talks like a human being, has a sweet voice and, above all also has a great capacity to learn whatever it is taught.If I were to be a bird, I would like my life to be a beautiful blend of freedom of flying in the high skies and the love and care given by man. I see advantages in both and find it difficult to make a choice.
My ambition as a bird would be able to fly high as high can be, like any other bird. This would give me an insight into what all exists in the atmosphere. I would also be able to assess first hand, the life of birds as a community, the advantages and the disadvantages they live with. I would share my experiences with my kin and understand the difficult ways of life. I would attain knowledge of lives of birds big and small as I would move with them and conversing with them while flying high in the air, or sitting on trees with my other colleagues.
Though I would love all this, at the same time I would love to become a pet in a nice family. This family would keep me closed in a cage lest I fly off. Here, in the family I would learn to be controlled and restricted. It would be no doubt a punishment of sorts to be tied down in a cage but I feel so happy imagining the love and care I would get from each member of the family that would adopt me.
Here, at home, I would be served food in a platter, water in a dish in a right royal style. Aha! what a life that could be for me. Hunting for food and being frightened of bigger birds attacking me would not be a care for me. I would be a loved one of many – what a wonderful feeling it gives.
The correct answer is: ( C ) The person above was incorrect.
Answer:
Closer analysis of the author's claim and the structure of the writing help in having basic and deeper knowledge and understanding of contents and full body of article. One will be able to look into author's mind and intentions of conveying the message. From this, a perfect summary of the article can be drawn since one have the full meaning of the text. It also encourage one to read more of the authors articles.
As Naiteru-Kop means ‘The Beginner of the Earth’, there is an element of plausibility.
Functions including human sacrificie occurred at the highest point of aztec pyramids.Tragedies came as a development of plays that preceded them that were made in magnificence of divine beings, for the most part Dionysus.
<h3>What was
Aristotle's theory on animals?</h3>
Aristotle's speculations didn't impact the formation of misfortunes, yet rather were made as a reaction to misfortunes. There was no genuine requirement for diversion then since individuals were by and large
The penance of people to the divine beings was a mission for the Aztecs as individuals are picked by their god Huitzilopochtli. The clerics saved the failures for the penances, and afterward the god was satisfied.
The premise of strict idea and custom action came from the possibility that a consistent relationship of trade with the heavenly was fundamental.
By proposing to the divine beings the fundamental energy important to keep up with action, one could keep on getting from him the gifts that permitted human life, like light, heat, water, hunting, the results of the earth.
For more information about Aristotle, refer the following link:
brainly.com/question/5399979
#SPJ1
