Answer:
Dennis Kozlowski was found guilty of grand larceny, falsifying business records, securities fraud, and conspiracy. He later admitted to have been driven by excessive greed as he overcompensated himself when he served as CEO of Tyco.
Explanation:
Dennis Kozlowski during his crime trial was found to have received "$81 million in unauthorized bonuses, the purchase of art for $14.725 million, and the payment by Tyco of a $20 million investment banking fee to Frank Walsh, a former Tyco director," according to wikipedia.com.
Answer: the firm does not have sufficient time to change the size of its plant the firm
Explanation:
In the short run a company is unable to change the size of its plant along with other fixed costs so the production capacity is limited. This is why in the short run, there is a limit to how much supply can increase in response to an increase in demand.
In the long run however, the company would have been able to increase its plant and its production capacity by extension as it would have had enough time to do so.
Answer: Elasticity of demand of samosas is 0.6
Explanation:
Price elasticity of demand measures the responsiveness of quantity demanded to a change in the price of the good. It can be measured using the mid-point method,




Therefore, elasticity of demand is 0.6
Answer: B. Accounts payable.
Explanation:
I think your question isn't well written, I believe it should be "Which of the following is not a capital component when calculating the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) for use in capital budgeting"?
The capital component when calculating the weighted average cost of capital for use in capital budgeting include the long-term debt, retained earnings, common stock and the preferred stock.
It should be noted that the account isn't among the options as it does not provide flow of capital.
Complete Question:
An investment adviser has placed an order with the underwriter for 250,000 shares of XYZ stock, a new company that will be listed on NASDAQ. The adviser will allocate this purchase to its largest discretionary accounts. This action is a(n):
Group of answer choices
A. breach of fiduciary duty
B. front-running violation
C. fair and reasonable practice
D. insider trading violation
Answer:
breach of fiduciary duty.
Explanation:
In this scenario, an investment adviser has placed an order with the underwriter for 250,000 shares of XYZ stock, a new company that will be listed on NASDAQ. The adviser will allocate this purchase to its largest discretionary accounts. This action is a breach of fiduciary duty.
According to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), if a registered investment adviser favours a client over another while allocating a block, it simply means that the registered investment adviser has violated his or her fiduciary duty to the other customers who were denied a piece of the block.