I think this view is NOT compatible with either of these hypothesis illustrated above. This is because each hypothesis presents prokaryotes as two separate groups. Prokaryotes are unicellular organism that lacks a membrane-bound nucleus, mitochondria, or any other membrane bound organelle unlike the eukaryotes which has the membrane bound nucleus and other organelles.
The new materials from the center of the Earth rises, so the hardens and pushes older pieces of the Earth away from each other, which causes the movement of materials.
<h3>
How do materials move within the earth?</h3>
The Earth's thermal energy is the main cause of the movement of materials within the earth surface. The Large continent-size plates moves slowly about the Earth's surface, which is driven by the thermal energy. The Convection currents transfer hot, buoyant magma to the lithosphere's layer at plate boundaries and hot spots. Convection currents also transfer denser, cooler material from the crust to Earth's interior through the process of subduction.
So we can conclude that: The new materials from the center of the Earth rises, so the hardens and pushes older pieces of the Earth away from each other, which causes the movement of materials.
Learn more about Earth here: brainly.com/question/746553
#SPJ1
So the organisms could be classified in the same animal families
Answer:
2, 4, and 5 refers to scientific revolution while on the other hand, the remaining statements shows scientific observation.
Explanation:
Cloning has the potential to significantly benefit a great many people, so it should not be considered immoral or risky is refers as scientific observation.
A scientist thinks that he might find serious inconsistencies in the fossil record if he conducts an excavation in a new location is refers scientific explanation because explanation is needed for it which can drawn from the scientific observation.
The rocks present in western Africa and eastern South America formed at the same place and at the same time is scientific observation because the scientists takes the data.
Even if modern organisms are found in ancient portions of the fossil record, this wouldn't challenge the theory of evolution in any way is refers to scientific explanation.
The cloning of organisms is an exciting area of study, and more resources should be be devoted to it so it is refers as scientific explanation.
The age, type, and composition of ancient rocks in western Africa are nearly identical to the age, type, and composition of rocks in eastern South America is scientific observation which is taken by the scientist through research.
Answer:
The activity that does not represent a beneficial contribution made by biologists is to improve the durability of non-stick coatings (option C).
Explanation:
The development and improvement of non-stick coatings does not correspond to an activity within the field of biology. Anti-stick coatings, such as Teflon, are products developed through industrial activity.
Biologists' activity is focused on living organisms and their interaction with the surrounding environment. Improving arable soils and food quality, as well as increasing life expectancy are activities that fall within the field of study of biology and its related disciplines.
Learn more:
Biology brainly.com/question/7337562
