Answer: a. It merely conducted some activity outside of Alaska and that activity took place through a website.
Explanation:
CalmDown can use the defence that all it did was to conduct an activity through it's website and this happened to be outside Alaska.
As such the company is still bound by the state that it is registered in which in this case would seem to be in Alaska. They are not to be bound by the laws of another jurisdiction from the one they are registered to if the activity was done on the internet.
Marcus should therefore try to bring action against them in Alaska if he can.
Answer:
Responsible, and achiever. That's what I'd go with.
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is A.
Explanation:
B doesnt make much sense and C is just plain stupid
Answer:
The relationship between marketing and finance is arguably one of the most important within any business. Traditionally perceived as an adversarial tug of war between marketing on one side spending the money and finance on the other trying to save it, this relationship has evolved into a modern marriage of equals.
Explanation:
hope it helps