Answer: No, both countries deployed large parts of their military forces to fight under the flag of another country.Yes, the U.S. military never directly engaged in these proxy wars.No, both countries still fought in proxy wars but not directly against each other.Yes, by definition, a proxy war means that there was no direct involvement of either nation.
In October 1973, it broke out the Fourth Arab-Israeli War, best known as the "Yom Kippur War" because the Arab countries enemy of Israel took advantage of the Yom Kippur ("Day of Expiation") holiday to launch a triple offensive against Israel. When the war seemed to go well for the Arabs because of the destruction of large numbers or Israeli warplanes, the U.S. resupplied the Israelis and made their losses good turning the outcome of the war to their favor.
The U.S. support of the Israelis in the Yom Kippur War infuriated the Arab oil producing countries who announced an oil embargo against the U.S. The price of crude oil went from 3 dollars per barrel to 12 dollars by the beginning of 1974. Since U.S. people were traditionally used to large cars consuming a lot of gas, since gas had always been cheap, a shortage of gas across the country quickly set in, An unexpected consequence of this gas shortage in the U.S., fuel-efficient cars of Japanese make began to become popular in the U.S., and it also forced the U.S. car industry to design smaller cars and fuel-efficient engines to compete with the Japanese car industry.
While at the drive-in Two-Bit sneaks behind Johnny puts his hands on both of their shoulders and said, "Okay, greasers, you've had it!" Johnny had recently been jumped by a gang of Soc and is still traumatized by the experience
Answer:
City states rised along east Africa because there was water and land I know this because I just took the test
Explanation:
African slave trade started here and Africans have to have water to grow crops and because if Africans sold slaves to Arabia so they could produce trade and because Islam did not allow enslavement of Muslims
The Council had been called to examine doctrine and reform. Charles V had wanted abuses looked at first in an attempt to please the Protestants and hopefully tempt them back to the church. Once they were back they could look at doctrine. Paul III did not want this as reforms could financially damage him and concessions could diminish his authority. The result was that two separate sections dealt with reform and doctrine simultaneously.
<span> if this helps!!</span>