The type of validity that McClelland is trying to establish is a form called predictive validity. Predictive validity is way of testing whether a score of a newly-constructed measurement predicts scores from another measure (a criterion) that has previously been found to be correlated with the constructed measurement. If the relationship is found in these two measurements, it can be said that the newly constructed measurement is valid.
Predictive validity is a part of the criterion-related group of validity, together with concurrent validity. The former differs from the latter in terms of when the criterion-measurement is administered – where if it is administered together it is concurrent validity, while if it is after it is predictive validity.
You might ask them to pick up their "primary refuse".
Primary refuse in archaeological terms is the undesirable items or materials found in the setting where it was utilized and disposed of.
This is inverse to another term utilized "secondary refuse" which are the undesirable items or materials that are expelled from the site at which they were utilized and are discarded at an alternate area.
Great Britain won the 19th century boer war hope that answers your question!
Dendrites are the branching extensions on the soma called.
<h3>What are dendrites?</h3>
This can be referred to as a tree branch due to its network of activities. It is the place from which the neuron is known to get information from other cells.
In the soma they are branching extensions that appear like the branches of a tree.
Read more on dendrites here:
brainly.com/question/11364230
#SPJ12