Yes, it is plagiarism.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Plagiarism means stealing or copying others work and showing it as one’s own work. It is also known as commitment of literary theft. Changing or editing someone’s work without mentioning them or giving credit to them.
Plagiarism can be avoided by mentioning the source where the content is copied or borrowed. The required information can be given to the followers regarding the content source.
Each information and content is protected by <u>copyright laws</u>. So misusing the content without the knowledge of the source person can lead to serious problem.
Answer: False
Explanation:
An endless sling is not a sling in which loops are formed at each end of the sling body by doubling over the material and securing it by sewing, weaving, or utilizing a compression fitting.
The answer is containing nomination campaign and general election campaign. In addition, one strategy that campaigns use to switch the media is staging media events. The aptitude of an office holder to fend off challengers is recognized as the scare-off effect. The federal election directive is the bureaucratic agency in custody of monitoring campaign activity.
Critical thinking could be used in this example to actively engage with the proposition and propose an alternative or another proposition. Maybe in my own life experience I've known women who drive better than man, so I already have first hand example of how this is a misbelieve, but in order to prove this i have to go a step further.
---
Skepticism should refrain us from making statement from things we don't know yet. The proposition is a generality and thus already tell us that is a prejudice, but moreover when we are talking about things without having knowledge is a good scientific practise to step back and know the argument before speaking.
---
Objectivity is what we should aim when examine datas and proposition. Once we have the data, we could objectevely tell if this proposition respects the truth or not. Some importance should also be given to the motivation and the qualitative data, and not only the raw quantitative data, as reading and analyse only one type could lead to more misunderstading.
---
Curiosity is what we should always bring to the table in everyday matter. In the proposition, we could step back and ask why this is a well consolidates rumour, or why are the reasons behind this saying. Curiosity should be the driven to explain the world in a more complex and rich way comparing to the way other people may live.
---
Other examples of proposition that could be examine by the scientific approach are almost endless. "Women are not good at STEM fields" for example, or "Men generally are more qualified leaders". It is possible to argue that every proposition could be examine in a scientific approach, and maybe we all should do it so.
