Answer:
In the absence of government public goods are likely to be under provided.
Explanation:
In Texas, the more than "more than hundred" agencies have substantial independence from the governor, which means that each agency has more latitude and independence than federal agencies in deciding what was meant by the legislature and in applying the law to unforeseen circumstances.
<h3>What is T
exas Constitution?</h3>
In Texas, the governor has little control over more than a hundred agencies. There are about 200 state agencies, most of which operate independently of the governor.
- Texas constitution provides the legislature with the power to enact any laws deemed deemed appropriate and and essential to carry out its stated duties.
- There is limited Government system. In a limited government, the constitution is subject to the laws of several inferior and superior authorities and may also be enforceable against them.
- The Texas constitution is a state constitution, but since it forbids the federal government from playing a role, we can infer that the federal government's authority is constrained.
Learn more about Texas legislature, here brainly.com/question/25194176
#SPJ4
Democracy is the rule of "demos" - people. However, it is not the case that all people want the same and that people can agree on what is important. Because of this, it is important that a compromise is reached in which everyone profits a bit : otherwise emocracy could "stall" due to conflicts (which is actually often the case in governments where the ruling party has only slight majority).
Answer: One significant distinction among Kush and Egypt is their areas. Kush was a domain toward the south of Egypt and was worked at the base of the mountains. They had a consistent measure of precipitation. This precipitation combined with the spillover from the mountains implied that they quite often had fruitful soil. This was an alternate story for Egypt. Egypt relied upon the yearly flooding of the Nile River so as to have great soil to plant and develop food required for endurance. This flooding was indispensable to their progress. Another contrast among Kush and Egypt is that sovereigns governed Kush, not at all like the male lords and pharaohs that controlled Egypt. They additionally fabricated burial chambers like the Egyptians did however the Kush by and large constructed burial chambers with level rooftops on them. Kush likewise had regular assets, for example, gold, ivory, and iron metal. Preservation is likewise a region where they had a few contrasts. The cycle of embalmment in Egypt was frequently held for those with abundance on the grounds that the cycle was costly and the average citizens couldn't manage the cost of it. Kush aristocrats likewise embalmed their dead however the ordinary citizens preserved their dead also.
Explanation:
