1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kompoz [17]
3 years ago
6

An argument in favor of the League of Nations would be

History
2 answers:
hjlf3 years ago
8 0

An argument in favor of the League of Nations would be that international cooperation in such an association would be a way of preventing and limiting wars and conflict.

Details:

An organization such as the League of Nations was the signature idea of US President Woodrow Wilson.  He had laid out 14 Points for establishing and maintaining world peace following the Great War (World War I).  Point #14 was the establishment of an international peacekeeping association. The Treaty of Versailles adopted that idea, and the League of Nations was established in 1920.  [Notably, the United States never joined the League, because the US Senate did not ratify the Treaty of Versailles.]

The League of Nations had set out clear goals for what it intended to do. The main aims of the League were disarmament across nations, preventing war through collective security of the international community, settling disputes between countries through negotiation, and improving welfare of people around the globe.  But it proved unable to meet those goals.  The United Nations, formed after World War II, has similar goals, and has been more effective in its efforts -- though there are still plenty of people who criticize the UN's effectiveness.

allochka39001 [22]3 years ago
4 0

I think the answer would be the League of Nation aimed to protect the rights of Man. It covers the rights of both genders as well people with different economic status, gender, and social roles. The League of Nations also aims to help settle international disputes and international security among the member and the countries outside it.

You might be interested in
Did the British Constitution have an impact on the US government
iogann1982 [59]
Yes poop lovers So the answer is amazingly yes
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do you guys think, bad or no? Last time she didn’t seem to care
PSYCHO15rus [73]

Answer:

do what you think is best.

Explanation:

have a wonderful day! :)

4 0
3 years ago
If you had been an activist during the civil rights movement, which group might you have joined and why?
krek1111 [17]
I would have joined the Congress for Racial Equality because people are not defined and should never be defined by their skin colour. Black people deserve to have exactly the same rights and deserve not to be oppressed anymore 
.
5 0
3 years ago
Which statement does not explain the decline of Puritan influence in New England?
Arada [10]
<span>A. People were more concerned about their farms and businesses 

The decline of Puritans influence in New England could be explained with the help of various factors: there was the fact that the first generation of Puritans were elders and fewer man were joining. Then, with the K</span><span>ing Philips war, may puritans were killed, making the number of communities that were Puritans ever lower. New people coming from England and other colonies were more interested in being merchants, thus new leaders come, aggravating the decline of the Puritans.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
What were the religious political and economic motivations behind the crusades?
gayaneshka [121]

The Crusades were called because of religious devotion but the call was answered because to the desire for political and economic gain.

A call went out for soldiers to take Jerusalem from the Seljuk Turks.  

Many second and third sons answered the call. In the Holy Land they could carve out principalities and become Lords. In Western Europe the land was all taken. The call was answer by most Crusaders for dreams of political and economic gain.

The Eastern Roman Empire had appealed for help became of the amount of land and control that they had lost to the Seljuk Turks.  

The agreement with the Pope was that the Crusaders would liberate not only Jerusalem but the lands lost to the control of the Turks.  

When the Crusaders liberated the land they kept the land for themselves. This showed that the reasons that the Crusaders answered the call was not religious devotion but economic greed.

Haha, hope this helps. <3 !

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the roles of the Council and the Permanent Court Of Justice in the organisation of the League of Nations?
    12·1 answer
  • What happened after geologists discovered oil in Cyrenaica in 1959?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the federal budget crisis affect the presidential election in 1996? People were disappointed that Clinton shut down the
    11·2 answers
  • Why do you think Alexander’s soldiers were willing to follow him for so many years, over so many miles, and after so many battle
    9·1 answer
  • The First Amendment guarantees freedom of the press. Why would the Supreme Court allow the government to limit this freedom
    12·1 answer
  • How did the National Origins Acts change immigration to the United States?
    6·2 answers
  • What do the lives and careers of pacal the Great and Moctezuma i suggest about the importance of leadership to a great civilizat
    5·2 answers
  • Which two cultures allow easier contact between the Suez canal?
    10·2 answers
  • Hey. How are you, I just answered a question asking and I wanna see if I can ask everyday. ;) &lt;3
    6·2 answers
  • Why did the US join the war? Select all that applies
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!