What were the main goals of the occupation forces after ww2?

1 answer:

4 0

After the second world war, the occupation of the German and Austrian regions was managed by 4 major powers: France, the United Kingdom, the United States of America, and the Soviet Union. The goals of these powers was twofold.

The first was the purging of National Socialist elements from Germany. After the war, thousands of Nazis escaped capture by the allies, with many returning to their lives as civilians. The occupying forces were attempting to ensure that these individuals would not exert major influence, and that Nazism would not rise again in post-war Germany. Here's an interesting orientation video produced by the US army during the post-war occupation period:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-EjnQwqbaQ

The second of these goals was the establishment of two new German states. The Soviet Union laid the ground work for what would become the communist German Democratic Republic in the late 1940s in the eastern half of Germany, while the allies established a market-liberal counterpart (the Federal Republic of Germany) in the west.

You might be interested in

Explain why American modernist writers might have perceived the world as chaotic in the early part of the 20th century.

Step2247 [10]

Modernist writers may have perceived the world as chaotic in the early part of the 20th century due to many events. These included things such as revolts and rebellions and World War I and many of which disrupted lives and caused great loss of life.

4 0

3 years ago

"To judge from the conduct of the opposite parties, we shall be led to conclude that they will mutually hope to evince the justn

vova2212 [387]

Answer:

In the given excerpt, Hamilton presented himself as a Federalist arguing that the Constitution is necessary to quiet the radical elements in society.

Explanation:

Federalist No. 1 was an essay written by Alexander Hamilton. This essay later became the series of Federalist Papers composed by Alexander Hamilton, John Madison, and John Jay under pseudonym 'Publius'.

Federalist No. 1 was written to the people of New York State. The given text is taken from Federalist No. 1.

In the given text, Hamilton presented himself as a federalist arguing the point that the Constitution is important to silent the radical elements in society. The paper was written with the purpose to convince the audience about the importance of Constitution.

4 0

3 years ago

I WILL GIVE U BRAINLIST

Vladimir [108]

Answer:

{Hello kirito here! I believe you answer here is-}

The similarities for all three of the branches is that they spend most of their time in Washington D.C.. The similarities for Legislative and Judicial are that they both involve the Congress. The similarities for Executive and Judicial are that they both review/approve laws and they can interrupter the Constitution.

a role in the legal system and each has its own powers, in a system of constitutional checks ... in the State House in Philadelphia at the Constitutional Convention in 1787.

Explanation:

{Hope this helps you! Brainliest if you want to give it to me!}

7 0

2 years ago

Which statement best typifies the Immigration Act of 1924? A. It supported immigration and American acceptance of different cult

den301095 [7]

Answer:

Option: C. It limited the number of immigrants American businesses could hire.

Explanation:

The immigration act of 1924 restricted the coming of immigrants from other countries into the United States. This act limited immigration in the country by placing a national origin quota system. This act established by Congress by putting in mind about the warnings on national security after World War I. The other purpose of the immigration act was to protect the US identity.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

I would have the constitution torn in shreds and scattered to the four winds of heaven. let us destroy the constitution and buil

Otrada [13]

This passage is explaining that although the Constitution seemingly boasts equality, in reality there still exists unfair treatment of other humans in the form of slavery. Therefore the speaker is claiming that the Constitution should be rewritten to protect against slavery and other forms of abuse and discrimination.

8 0

3 years ago