Answer:
During World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union fought together as allies against the Axis powers. However, the relationship between the two nations was a tense one. Americans had long been wary of Soviet communism and concerned about Russian leader Joseph Stalin’s tyrannical rule of his own country. For their part, the Soviets resented the Americans’ decades-long refusal to treat the USSR as a legitimate part of the international community as well as their delayed entry into World War II, which resulted in the deaths of tens of millions of Russians. After the war ended, these grievances ripened into an overwhelming sense of mutual distrust and enmity.
Postwar Soviet expansionism in Eastern Europe fueled many Americans’ fears of a Russian plan to control the world. Meanwhile, the USSR came to resent what they perceived as American officials’ bellicose rhetoric, arms buildup and interventionist approach to international relations. In such a hostile atmosphere, no single party was entirely to blame for the Cold War; in fact, some historians believe it was inevitable.
The Cold War: Containment
By the time World War II ended, most American officials agreed that the best defense against the Soviet threat was a strategy called “containment.” In his famous “Long Telegram,” the diplomat George Kennan (1904-2005) explained the policy: The Soviet Union, he wrote, was “a political force committed fanatically to the belief that with the U.S. there can be no permanent modus vivendi [agreement between parties that disagree].” As a result, America’s only choice was the “long-term, patient but firm and vigilant containment of Russian expansive tendencies.” “It must be the policy of the United States,” he declared before Congress in 1947, “to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation…by outside pressures.” This way of thinking would shape American foreign policy for the next four decades.
Explanation:
hope this helped
Invasions by Barbarian tribes. ...
Economic troubles and overreliance on slave labor. ...
The rise of the Eastern Empire. ...
The most important reason for the collapse of Rome was the failure to actually integrate what they conquered. When Roman soldiers conquered new lands, it was rare that they ever attempted to force their culture, ideals, or laws upon the natives and barbarians. Thus, when the Empire began suffering internal struggles, the natives they had conquered decided to take action, which lead to the swift collapse by barbarian invasion from all sides. It's hard to pick a LEAST important reason, seeing that there were many of them, but I suppose a contender would most likely be the common refusal of the Empire to even acknowledge that barbarians were rising. On the outer edges of their territory, in places like Gaul and Morocco, the Roman government was reluctant to even recognize the threat of the barbarians, thinking that even accepting that these barbarians were causing trouble would weaken their prestige in the public eye.
What I did was look up in google Florida's preamble and I got "<span>We, the people of the State of </span>Florida<span>, being grateful to Almighty God for our constitutional liberty, in order to secure its benefits, perfect our government, insure domestic tranquility, maintain public order, and guarantee equal civil and political rights to all, do ordain and establish this constitution."</span>
Lead expeditions to make the area. Made transportation a lot easier by expanding railroads out west. Created roads for easier travel. Established courts and government buildings. Sent the armed forces to make sure everything was safe. The question is vague so I kind of have to give you a vague answer.
Answer: The Federalists 10 supports the idea of a centralized government.
Explanation:
Madison in Federalist 10 argues that it is necessary to have an established government to “break and control the violence of faction” that is those who do not support government administration and oppose legislation. He states that the government can hold the power to ensure that society remains functional saying “a republic… promises the cure”. Madison then argues that the only problem arises from majority factions because the principle of popular sovereignty should prevent minority factions from gaining power.The “Agrippa” letters appear to have been written by James Winthrop, who was register of probate in Middlesex when these letters were written. He argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, while taking too much power away from state and local governments.
The most important issue at stake in this debate is the question of the future governmental structure of the United States. Would it be one central government or a union of small individual governments. The independent United States was afraid that one centralized government would take away power from the people and it will be too far removed to represent the average citizen, others are afraid that without a strong governmental figure, disorder would ensue.
