Is it possible to find the same gene in two different kinds of organisms but not find the protein that is produced from that gen
e? If you found the same gene in all organisms you test, what does this suggest about the evolution of this gene in the history of life on earth?
Does the use of DNA sequences in the study of evolutionary relationships mean that other characteristics are unimportant in such studies? Explain your answer.
Yes, quite frankly it is possible to find a same gene if you're in the same class of species, but finding the protein....I believe that's impossible because in every type of gene, you have the same proteins that make you function the same way. Without them you wouldn't be able to function properly.
If I found the same gene in all organisms that I've tested, I would be intrigued because that would be a giant step in evolution. My reason for this answer is because if you have the same gene that would technically mean we all specifically came from the same species of animals.
No, that's not true because other characteristics would eventually help us in many things, studies would help us get our brain much stronger and the intelligence level would be extraordinary.
<span>The scientist who melted glass to simulate a microscope was Robert Hooke, in 1660. He was an English physicist, and he looked at insects and handheld objects. He named the cell for the cell of a monk, because to him it appeared to be a self-contained room.</span>
A. parasitism. The plasmodium is helped while the human host, harmed. b. mutualism. The bacteria is supplied with a living environment while the host human is supplied with vitamin K
Wind turbines operate on a simple principle. The energy in the wind turns two or three propeller-like blades around a rotor. The rotor is connected to the main shaft, which spins a <span>generator to create electricity.</span>
