Answer:
Explanation:
The population would decrease I believe because that means that if there is more organism that an environment can handle that means there won't be enough resources for all of the organism like food that means the population will slowly die off.
Answer:
The eukaryotic plant animal cells are differ having some cell organelles in it.
Explanation:
The first difference is the cell wall, which is present in all eukaryotic plants. It gives shape and rigidity to the plants. But all the animal cell the outer covering is cell membrane. They lack cell wall.
All the plant cell have chlorophyll pigment. It helps them to photosynthesis. In animal cell, chlorophyll molecule are absent. So they depend on plants for their food.
The eukaryotic plant cell more space is occupied by the vacuoles. It stores food and water for the plants. However, animal cells have no vacuole or if present, it is very small in size.
All animal cells have lysosomes, which help in digestion of various materials in the cell. Plants does not contain lysosomes.
Besides this organelles all other structure of plant and animals are similar. They both have nucleus, DNA, cytoplasm, mitochondria, etc.
Answer:
A. It allows two populations to evolve separately.
Explanation:
Geographic isolation is theorized to have catalyzed the formation of new species. Let’s say groups A and B of a bird species get separated by something, and they can’t cross between to interbreed or exchange alleles.
We describe this as no gene flow, which is the opposite of choices C and D. Because of this, they may diverge if given enough time due to the difference in environmental pressures, because they’re now in different environments.
B is incorrect because it doesn’t apply.
Because you could easily contaminate the results of the urine if you don't follow exactly what the strict rules dictate This could be a very dangerous thing because if you contaminate the results, then other doctors would think that the patient has some disease that needs to be taken care of which in reality they do not. The patient could also have to go through things or waste money on things that they don't need to because there was something in the urine that wasn't supposed to be there which was added because they didn't follow the strict rules. Then the doctor who contaminated it could be sued for malpractice which is never a good thing.
